The sudden and coordinated offensive launched by the Baloch Liberation Army (BLA) under Operation Herof (Black Storm) Phase II marks one of the most significant escalations in Pakistan’s troubled province of Balochistan in recent years. Striking simultaneously across Quetta, Mastung, Nushki, Gwadar, Panjgur, Kharan, and Pasni, the insurgents have challenged Pakistan’s writ of the state, exposed security vulnerabilities, and reignited questions about governance, legitimacy, and stability in the country’s largest yet most neglected province.
While casualty figures remain
contested, the scale, coordination, and geographic spread of the attacks
suggest that this is not a routine flare-up but a deliberate strategic
escalation with far-reaching implications for Pakistan’s internal security,
regional geopolitics, and the future of the China–Pakistan Economic Corridor
(CPEC).
A Province in Perpetual
Turmoil
Balochistan has long been a
paradox within Pakistan: rich in minerals, strategically vital due to Gwadar
port, yet politically marginalised and economically underdeveloped. For
decades, Baloch nationalist groups have accused Islamabad of resource exploitation,
political suppression, and demographic engineering.
The BLA, one of the most
prominent separatist outfits, frames its struggle as one for
self-determination, arguing that projects like CPEC primarily benefit
Pakistan’s federal elite and Chinese interests while sidelining local
communities.
Operation Herof Phase II appears
to be a calculated attempt to demonstrate that the insurgency is not only alive
but evolving — employing suicide tactics, simultaneous multi-city assaults, and
even the deployment of female fighters, signalling both operational
sophistication and ideological mobilisation.
Pakistan’s Likely Security
Response: More Iron, Less Heart
In the wake of these attacks,
Pakistan is almost certain to double down on its militarised approach to
Balochistan.
This will likely include:
- Expanded deployment of the Army and Frontier Corps
- Intensified intelligence operations
- Increased checkpoints, curfews, and internet blackouts
- Wider arrests of suspected sympathisers
- Tighter control over universities, media, and civil society
While this may suppress violence
in the short term, history suggests that heavy-handed tactics deepen
alienation, creating fertile ground for renewed insurgency.
Politically, Islamabad is also
expected to intensify its narrative of “foreign-backed terrorism,” particularly
targeting India — a familiar strategy used to deflect domestic criticism and
legitimise security crackdowns.
Regional Ripple Effects
Pakistan’s accusations of Indian
involvement, is unsubstantiated.
Afghanistan Factor
Islamabad may accuse the Afghan
Taliban of providing safe havens or transit routes for Baloch militants,
potentially straining already fragile Pakistan–Taliban relations and risking
cross-border tensions along the Durand Line.
Iran’s Quiet Anxiety
Iran, which faces its own Baluch
insurgency, will be deeply concerned about instability spilling across its
border. Quiet intelligence coordination between Tehran and Islamabad is likely
to increase, particularly around border security.
CPEC Under Siege?
Perhaps the most consequential
impact of this escalation lies in its implications for CPEC and China’s
strategic investments in Pakistan.
Beijing is unlikely to abandon
CPEC, but it will almost certainly demand stronger security guarantees. This
may lead to:
- A larger Chinese security presence
- Heavily fortified economic zones in Gwadar
- Greater Pakistani military protection around infrastructure
projects
However, these measures could
further alienate local Baloch communities, transforming Gwadar into a heavily
militarised enclave — secure, but politically illegitimate in the eyes of many
residents.
Chinese firms may slow
investment timelines, reassess risk, or pressure Islamabad for more aggressive
counterinsurgency measures, tying economic cooperation to security performance.
Where Is This Headed? Three
Possible Futures
1. Intensification (Most
Likely)
More attacks, harsher
crackdowns, rising civilian suffering, and deeper ethnic polarisation.
2. Containment Without
Resolution
Pakistan regains surface-level
control, but fails to address root grievances — setting the stage for future
violence.
3. Political Dialogue (Least
Likely)
A genuine attempt at
reconciliation through amnesty, resource-sharing, and greater provincial
autonomy — historically unlikely given Pakistan’s preference for military
solutions.
The Bigger Picture
Operation Herof Phase II is not
merely a security challenge; it is a crisis of governance, legitimacy, and
state-society relations in Pakistan.
For Islamabad, the dilemma is
stark: continue a militarised approach that fuels resentment, or risk political
reform that challenges entrenched power structures.
For China, Balochistan
represents both opportunity and vulnerability — a gateway to the Arabian Sea
that could just as easily become a strategic liability.
For the region, the conflict
underscores how local insurgencies can intersect with great-power competition,
economic corridors, and geopolitical fault lines.
Conclusion
Balochistan’s latest eruption of
violence is a warning that development without consent, security without
justice, and investment without inclusion will only breed instability.
Unless Pakistan pairs its
security operations with meaningful political engagement, economic equity, and
genuine federal reform, Operation Herof Phase II may be remembered not as an
isolated episode — but as another chapter in an unresolved and increasingly
dangerous conflict.
No comments:
Post a Comment