SPREAD MESSAGE OF INDIAN NATIONAL SECURITY TO AS MANY INDIANS AS POSSIBLE. LET US FREE INDIA OF CORRUPTION BY SPREADING THE MESSAGE TO AS MANY PEOPLE.MANY OF THE ARTICLES HAVE BEEN RECEIVED AS FORWARDED MAIL FROM VARIOUS FRIENDS . SHOULD SOME FACTS BE NOT CORRECT , YOU ARE REQUESTED TO PUT IT IN REMARKS BELOW THE ARTICLE. THIS WILL ENSURE A MORE BALANCED PERSPECTIVE OF THE SUBJECT DISCUSSED.
Total Pageviews
Sunday, 29 October 2023
Monday, 15 May 2023
Let Parochialism not Afflict the Services-Major General Mrinal Suman
Parochialism is a commonly used term with wide-ranging definitions that are
pejorative in connotation. Essentially, parochialism denotes narrowness of views both
in substance and scope. It implies inability to consider issues in larger and wider
perspective. In other words parochialism is a manifestation of narrow-mindedness
and pettiness. As human beings are products of their environment, their attitude and
disposition get moulded in the formative years, both at home and work place.
Although the underlying reason for all types of parochialism is an attitude of
insularity, they get manifested differently.
Parochialism is a human weakness. According supremacy to local and immediate
interests over larger issues is a common trait and phenomenon. While parochialism
remains harmless within acceptable limits, it becomes cancerous when allowed to
proliferate to unhealthy intensity. It can afflict body politic of any nation, society or
organisation with fatal consequences. History stands testimony that a nation infested
with the virus of parochialism has always been an easy prey for subjugation. No one
knows this bitter truth better than India, whose centuries-long suffering under
foreign rule was the direct fallout of the malaise of parochialism.
Unfortunately, India has learnt nothing from the past and similar trends are raising
their vicious heads again all over the country. In this dismal scenario, the armed
forces stand as the solitary bulwark against fissiparous forces. Being united India’s
only hope, they cannot fail the nation. Therefore, it is vitally important that they be
kept scrupulously free of the virus of parochialism lest it destroys organisational
cohesion and degrades their fighting potential.
Regrettably, due to lack of progressive exposure, many service officers fail to acquire
broader vision even while occupying higher ranks. They grow in career but fail to
outgrow narrow mindsets. They remain weighed down with local issues. Their
excessive deportment towards immediate affiliations is a result of their inability to
grasp and fully appreciate criticality of larger issues.
The armed forces are threatened by three types of parochialism – service,
regimental and communal. These have been discussed below.
Service Parochialism
Service parochialism can be defined as excessive and unhealthy concern for one’s
own service, even at the cost of national interests. It is most relentless at the top
where higher commanders get too encumbered with it. Service parochialism is also a
manifestation of acute inferiority complex and accompanying sense of insecurity.
Ostensibly, many commanders talk of service interests but their primary concern is
to ward off perceived threats to their personal aspirations and safeguard their own
turf. They fear loss of their central stage status and dread becoming fringe players.
2
Therefore, they keep harping about service interests and infect the whole
organisation with a parochial outlook. Blinkers of service parochialism render self-
serving commanders incapable of understanding that their mutual antagonism is
detrimental to national interests.
Inter-service parochialism is the primary impediment to the development of jointness
amongst the three services. The Army buys helicopters without consulting the Air
Force lest the Air Force stalls the whole process. It procures deep sea diving
equipment without drawing benefit from Navy’s expertise. As reported by
Comptroller and Auditor General in his report, the three services have procured the
same equipment (e.g. unmanned aerial vehicles, sniper rifles and underwater diving
equipment) from the same foreign vendor at different rates. Their reluctance to join
hands resulted in losing benefits of economies of scale and commonality of support
infrastructure.
Every step towards jointness is considered anti-service and opposed bitterly. Take
the case of the ongoing debate about the need to have a Chief of Defence Staff
(CDS). Not a soul in his wisdom can oppose the measure. It is apparent that the
opposition is being whipped up purely for envisioned service (in fact personal)
interests. Anyone who opposes CDS on the grounds of national interest is a
downright liar. Worse, he lacks moral courage and nerve to admit that his opposition
is based on parochialism and hides behind the façade of overall national defence
concerns. When a Service Chief opposes CDS, he is worried that he would become a
lesser personage and nothing else. He uses the plank of service interests to hide his
own diffidence. There cannot be a more shameful example of parochialism getting
the better of national interests.
Regimental Parochialism
Prejudiced attitudes based on regimental, corps and branch affiliations have been
collectively referred to herein as regimental parochialism. The services rightly
consider regimental spirit to be a battle winning factor as it knits a group together.
Up to unit level, regimental spirit is a force-multiplier but it becomes counter-
productive at higher levels. As all cohesive groups become inward looking, it gives
rise to intolerance for others, thereby generating ‘we versus they’ or ‘regimental
versus outsider’ syndromes.
Many commanders, even after rising above unit level, fail to shed their regimental
mindset. Non-development of broadmindedness forces them to behave in prejudiced
and partisan manner. Some commanders take pride in flaunting their regimental
preferences by dispensing undue favours to their regimental officers. For example,
when a new Army Chief deploys his parent battalion at the Rashtrapati Bhavan, he
reveals his narrow mindset and proves his unsuitability to head the Army. A Chief
has to be above all predispositions.
Further, when unit turn-over, citations and other awards are decided under the
influence of regimental bias, the environment loses faith in the fairness of the
system, thereby encouraging factionalism and dissensions. There have been
instances when bigoted Army Commanders have struck mutual deals to promote
their regimental protégés on quid pro quo basis. When selection for higher ranks is
influenced by regimental affiliations, many deserving officers lose out as vacancies at
the top are limited. Thus, merit ceases to be of any consequence. Mediocre and
undeserving officers get promoted. The armed forces are deprived of the best talent.
3
The institution of Colonel Commandants has contributed the maximum to the growth
of regimental parochialism. Being an anachronistic institution, it inhibits progressive
thinking and breeds unhealthy predisposition. Earlier a Colonel Commandant used to
be like a father figure who acted as the ‘conscience keeper’ of the regiment and a
guardian of regimental traditions. Now, he functions like the regiment’s
representative in top hierarchy whose task is to wangle maximum advantages for his
regiment, apparently at the cost of others who may be more deserving.
Communal Parochialism
Indian society has always been plagued by divisive forces. As precedence is given to
communal identity (based on region, religion, caste and sub-caste) over nationalism,
most people remain embroiled in petty bickering and internal squabbles.
Earlier, community bias was unheard of in the services. It was considered a
sacrilege. Indian armed forces had inherited a legacy of keeping religion and region
out of its normal functioning. Religion (along with politics and women) was never
allowed to be discussed in the officers’ messes. Unfortunately, the spreading virus of
communalism in the country appears to be affecting some military leaders as well.
In the recent past, a senior commander was derisively called ‘clan chief’. He was
known to surround himself with cronies from his clan and was forever ready to take
up cudgels on their behalf. Through his ‘clan contacts’ at the Ministry, he managed
extra-ordinary dispensations for his clan mates. Similarly, another senior commander
was known to provide unhindered access to soldiers from his state. During his
outstation visits, a discreet message used to be passed around. Both the commander
and his wife used to receive their state-mates and note down their
complaints/requests. Needless to say, both the above mentioned commanders
forfeited respect of the services. By their communal acts, they had betrayed the trust
of their commands and let them down. Their failure to rise above petty parochialism
proved their unfitness to occupy high appointments.
Communal predisposition is the worst and most destructive type of parochialism. It
has the potential to split the services on communal lines – a dreadful scenario
indeed. Thankfully, communal parochialism is a recent phenomenon and is at a
nascent stage at present. It is time cognizance is taken of this threat and suitable
measures initiated to nip it in the bud.
Finally, it is time to act
Parochialism is an anathema. It poses a grave threat to the credibility of the military
leadership. To be trusted by one’s subordinates is the greatest reward and highest
accolade that a leader can earn. Trust is a non-substitutable, priceless, intuitive and
complex force. It flourishes on credibility that a leader enjoys in his command. Trust
is the expectancy that the followers can rely on a leader’s impartial and just
approach. Subordinates feel let down when they witness partisan conduct of their
commanders.
Merit is invariably the first casualty of parochialism. No organisation can flourish
unless there are strong merit-performance ethical linkages in place. Every
dispensation extended on the basis of parochial disposition amounts to depriving a
4
deserving claimant of his lawful rights. As soldiers lose faith in the fairness of the
system, a certain degree of despondency sets in, forcing the aggrieved to approach
courts for getting their due.
Service parochialism has already done incalculable harm to the development of
jointness of the three services. They remain divided and true to character, revel in
their disunity. National security is too serious a matter to be allowed to be held
hostage by misplaced service parochialism of a few egocentric commanders. Such
elements must be identified, shamed and exposed to the public for their failure to
assign supremacy to national interests. They should be considered unworthy of the
high ranks that they come to occupy.
Abolition of the institution of Colonel Commandant will have a decisive
effect in curtailing the growth of regimental parochialism. Another simple
measure will be to restrict regimental entrapments to the rank of Colonel.
All senior officers should wear a common uniform without any badges that
announce their regimental identity.
Militaries swear by norms. Norms are unwritten rules that get evolved due to
precedents and conventions set over a period of time. It is for the current military
leadership to rise above parochial mindsets to set stringent norms for non-partisan
conduct with suitable monitoring mechanism to rectify aberrations. For example, it
should be a proscriptive norm that commanders should not select their personal staff
from their own arm/regiment or community.
Senior commanders must be apprised and constantly reminded of the true meaning
of professional integrity – treating all subordinates impartially without service,
regimental and communal bias. To betray an unquestioning soldier’s trust by playing
favourites is the worst kind of impropriety a commander can be guilty of. In fact,
parochialism is a manifestation of selfish nature, unprofessional character and
unethical disposition. Being an act of the worst kind of blasphemy, parochialism must
be ruthlessly curbed, lest the services lose their much vaunted cohesion.
Friday, 14 April 2023
M 777-भारतीय आर्मीची ताकद वाढणार -; फक्त मृत्यू बरसतात या नव्या भारतीय त...
Monday, 28 November 2022
Saturday, 17 September 2022
Saturday, 9 April 2022
Thursday, 4 November 2021
SALUTE TO LT RISHIKUMAR NAUSHERA MARTYER
Friday, 12 February 2021
21 Para (SF) Celebrates Silver Jubilee Of Its Conversion - Lt General VIJAY OBEROI | 11 FEBRUARY, 2021
21 PARA (SF) or the Waghnakhs’, as they are well known, is a unique Special Forces (SF) battalion, as it is the only SF battalion that has been converted from an existing infantry battalion.
The Infantry battalion was the 21st Battalion of the Maratha Light Infantry Regiment. Although this battalion was raised on February 111985, it was part of one of the senior most regiments of the Indian Army, which has recently completed 250 years of service in the Indian Army in August 2018.
In early 1990s, a major exercise was undertaken by Army Headquarters to convert the then existing three Para Commando battalions into SFs and increase the strength by another battalion. I was the DGMO at that point of time and had implemented this change.
A major change in the roles of the units, making them more akin to Special Operations Forces (SOFs) of other countries, was formalised. I also had the honour of being appointed the first Colonel of the newly formed SF, the only time they moved away from being just super-infantry!
However, the change was short-lived, because the Parachute Regiment, of which the three Para Commando battalions were part of, did not countenance these battalions going out of the Regiment and as soon as I moved out to command a Strike Corps, the then Chief succumbed to the pressure from the Parachute Regiment lobby and the units reverted to again becoming super-infantry! But that is a different story!
This narrative is about the current 21 PARA (SF). 21 Maratha LI had been selected for the conversion, as all other Infantry Colonels of the Regiments had chosen not to part with any of their battalions. Being the Colonel of the Maratha Light Infantry at that time, we had the foresight to offer one of our Maratha battalions for conversion, as we were convinced that it was in the national interest. In addition, we had given many of our battalions to other regiments in the past and all had done extremely well and had brought laurels to both regiments.
21 Maratha LI completed its conversion to Special Forces on 01 Feb 1996, after successfully completing its gruelling probation over two years. The outfit thus holds the unique distinction of being the only infantry battalion to have been directly converted to Special Forces.
However, our overall aim of making the then existing three (1,9 and 10) Para Commando battalions plus the new 21 Para Commando to exclusive Special Forces units lay in ruins, as explained above.
The Blood, Sweat and Grit of all the torchbearers involved in bringing the unit to the present pedestal needs to be applauded and cherished. On this day, 11 Feb 2021, the Waghnakhs are celebrating their Silver Jubilee of Conversion.
A about their nom d’ guerre Waghnakhs. The Wagh Nakh or Tiger’s Claws is a typical Maratha weapon of Shivaji’s time, which is a knuckle duster of steel flanked by two finger holes through which the thumb and small finger are inserted, concealing three to five curved blades in the palm of the hand and turning the wearer's hand into a tiger claw.
For complete concealment, the knuckle duster could be decorated with gems giving the appearance of wearing rings. The blades, like the tiger claws they are named for, are made to slash through an opponent's skin and muscle. In some cases, there is the addition of one or two blades that project from the side of the wagh nakh, an additional weapon that would have been used for jabbing, or thrusting.

The wagh nakh is most often associated with the Maratha warrior Shivaji, who fought under Islamic rulers -- the Moghuls in the north and various independent Sultans in the Deccan. In 1659, a meeting was arranged between Shivaji and General Afzal Khan of the Bijapur Sultanate. Shivaji suspected that the General would try something tricky and so wore chainmail under his clothing and a wagh nakh in his hand.
When the two leaders embraced, the traditional greeting, Khan tried to attack Shivaji with his dagger but it failed to pierce Shivajis chainmail. Shivaji then used his hand with the small, concealed wagh nakh and, like a tiger, clawed Khan, inflicting mortal wounds.
Reverting to 21 PARA (SF), the Paltan specialises in Jungle Warfare, although it has taken part in many operations in rural and urban settings too and has left its mark in the entire north eastern part of our country. One may recall that following the terrorist attack on an army convoy in Manipur a few years back, it was 21 PARA that had carried out a surgical operation in the border areas of Myanmar and given the terrorists and insurgents a befitting reply. The operation under command of the then Commanding Officer of 21 PARA (SF), Colonel Saurabh Singh Shekhawat was a complete success where only terrorists were neutralised and there had been no collateral damage or any casualties to our troops.
I am given to understand that both the serving ‘Colonels’ of the Maratha Light Infantry, Lt Gen Asit Mistry and of the Parachute Regiment, Lt Gen Paramjit Singh Sangha would be present for the celebrations of the Paltan. The Army’s SFs units are arguably the best infantry units in our Army, but despite their nomenclature of SFs, they do not fall in the category of Special Operations Forces (SOFs) of countries like USA, Russia or UK, whose top rated units: US Delta Force; Russian Spetsnaz; and British SAS, are SF units in the classical genre.
We do have the potential and professional zeal to become like the above quoted units, as our officers, JCO’s and Jawans are the best, but we are far too mired in regimental issues and non-issues and our hierarchy is far too risk-averse! The other reason is that although our SF Units have won many a battle, they get stymied by our Ministry of Defence (MoD) manned by civilian officials, who neither have the expertise nor the desire to learn about how the army operates and the sense of urgency.
Unless the SF are modernised on a continuous basis in terms of the latest weapons and other warlike equipment, we will not be able to utilise the full potential of these special troops, which have an increasingly important role to play on the future battlefield. In the 25 years of its existence since the conversion from 21 Maratha LI to 21 PARA (SF), the battalion has shown its mettle; won both battles and laurels and has become a most effective and fearless machine for the battles likely to be faced in future. More power to this exuberant SF battalion that at the moment of writing is carrying out a para jump by both serving personnel and veterans of the battalion, commemorating their Silver Jubilee.
Cover Photograph:Bagh nakh (tiger-claw weapon of Indian origin) made of lacquered steel
Lt General Vijay Oberoi is a former Vice Chief of Army Sta
Sunday, 17 January 2021
भारतीय लष्कर दिनानिमित्त...🙏* *--डॉ. श्रीकृष्ण जोशी , रत्नागिरी*
