Total Pageviews

Monday 26 August 2024

Shivaji Maharaj's Tactics & Strategies-MAJ GEN NITIN GADKARI

 


Tactics:

The above factors influenced the entire gamut of Shivaji Maharaj's fighting strategy and tactics. Shivaji Maharaj knew his aim of establishing 'Hindavi Swarjya' could not be achieved through mere hope. Yet he understood the immense shortfall in resources at his disposal. Therefore, his first challenge was how to start. He thus formed the strings of preliminary strategies. He formed a small army with the help of his close friends and their followers. He was then looking for places from where they could operate. The only answer to this dilemma was to secure a few forts for himself. Shivaji Maharaj secured the fort of Torna at the young age of 16. The capture of Torna came with a buried treasure. It allowed Shivaji Maharaj to make a few more forts, as forts allowed his small force to fight and hit back. After Torna Shivaji, Maharaj conquered newer forts, Chakan, Kondana, and Purandar. By 1659, apart from those named above, Shivaji had a string of hill forts with him: Rajgadh, Rohira, Tikona, Rajmachi, Lohgarh, Pratapgadh etc. Shivaji Maharaj had also captured many forts on the Konkan coast as well. For Shivaji Maharaj, forts were the lifeline to his rule and the instruments of fighting his enemies. The forts were not merely defensive positions. Shivaji Maharaj used them for offensive actions. He used the forts like a Pivot. It is a term that is aptly described in the Indian Army's 'Glossary of Military Terms.' They are defensive positions established in flat terrain with vast frontages, like in the Rajasthan and western Punjab deserts. The term used for them is the 'Pivot of Manoeuvre'. A Pivot has all the elements for a defensive and offensive battle. Forts for Shivaji Maharaj had a similar use. They were positions from where Shivaji's commanders could unleash their offensive elements at the appropriate time. All the hill forts were in a plug-and-play mode. It meant there was no sacrosanct rule that force from Fort A would return to Fort A. A force out on an expedition could get into any fort for short durations and act as reserves or strike elements. Hence, the Mughals found the siege of hill forts a dangerous tactical posture.

The use of forts as a war tactic is best understood by studying the campaign of Afzal Khan into Jawli. In 1660, Shivaji Maharaj had a fort constructed in Jawali: Pratapgadh. This fort was the principal instrument in the killing of Afzal Khan and the defeat of his army of around 10,000 cavalry, assisted infantry, and artillery that had travelled from Bijapur by the express sanction of his sultan Adil Shah II. His offensive actions also included capturing newer forts so that they offered mutual support to each other. At the time of his death, he had 240 forts, but by 1665, he had about 35 under his control. A part of offensive tactics would be covered later when we discuss two of his famous battles in 1670-72.

Offensive Strategy:

Shivaji Maharaj's first strategy was inspired by Fabius, the famous Roman general, in 220 BC.

"Sometimes the Best way to win is not to lose."

"The Fabian military strategy involves wearing down an enemy over time through a war of attrition and indirection. The strategy is named after Roman General Quintus Fabius Maximus, who used it in 221 BC to stop Carthaginian General Hannibal's invasion of Rome. The Fabian strategy is known for its use of time and is traditionally favoured by the weaker side. The weaker side avoids decisive engagements and instead uses tactics to harass the enemy's lines of communication. The goal is to weaken the enemy, disrupt its supply, and affect its morale. The side using the Fabian strategy may believe that time is on their side, or they may adopt it when no other strategy is possible".

Hence, during his initial warning years, Shivaji Maharaj fought with the Adil Shahi and Mughals in a war of attrition. His inferior forces would strike and not engage the enemy in a confrontation. They would disengage and vanish into the hills or forests at the first sign of a significant force coming, only to regroup at a pre-selected rendezvous point. Central to this strategy was the possessions of the hill forts. Luckily for Shivaji Maharaj, the Sahyadri was a favourite destination for the earlier Hindu kings of the 11th and 12th centuries CE. So many of those forts existed even in the 17th century, either in the hands of the Mughals or the Adil Shahi forces, since Nizam Shahi had collapsed and ceased to exist in 1636 CE. The Mughals and the Adil Shahi forces distributed all the Nizam Shahi forts.

Shivaji Maharaj realised that a Mughal or the Adil Shahi soldier was not a hill creature, and his fitness was found wanting. He took adequate advantage of it and created turmoil in their ranks through hit-and-run tactics. Unlike the Rajputs in the North and NW of India, the Marathas were averse to giving a battle. The Mughals, in the beginning, called it cowardice, till realisation dawned on them that it was a very well-thought-of strategy of Shivaji Maharaj.

Trickery as a Strategy.         During that period, trickery or deceit was an instrument to get the better of the enemy, and using it was not considered blasphemy. Afzal Khan used it in Jawli. He came to kill Shivaji Maharaj under the garb of friendship. Adil Shah used it to imprison Shivaji Maharaj's father in Bijapur. Aurangzeb used it against Shivaji Maharaj when he put him under house arrest at Agra. Most of the forts were captured in those days by deceit. So, deceit was a common trait to get the better of the enemy. Being short on resources, Shivaji Maharaj was adept at using trickery as an instrument of his strategy.  

Uniting the Maval Chiefs.    One of the greatest strategic victories of Shivaji Maharaj was to bring all the Maval chiefs under a single flag. In the period between the capture of the Torna in 1646 and 1660, i.e. up to Afzal Khan's march into Jawli Shivaji Maharaj, he had a turbulent time trying to balance his force. The old Maratha province was divided into small provinces ruled by local chieftains. Their provinces were called Mavals. The Maval belt gave Shivaji Maharaj most of his fighting strength. These 12 regions of Maval were ruled by chieftains who called themselves the Raja. They were the Deshmukhs, Sar-Deshmukhs, and the Sarnaiks, Desais. Meaning the landlords. They exuded tremendous control and power in their respective regions. First, they were unwilling to join Shivaji Maharaj and share his dream. For them, the sardeshmukhi under any ruler was more acceptable; no matter who ruled the Deccan, their position was secure and hereditary. Amidst such exalted status, they did not want to fight a superior force for a dream that seemed unattainable to all initially. Thus, Shivaji Maharaj's battle was both internal and external. Even Napoleon has remarked, "It is very difficult for a nation to create an army when it is not already a body of officers and non-commissioned officers to serve as a nucleus of a military organisation." Historians have written about his military and administrative exploits. Still, his ability to rein in the Maratha Maval chiefs has not received the same fame. Shivaji Maharaj's soldiers were his military strength. They made his force become such a ferocious and agile fighting force. One Maval chief worth mentioning is 'Chadrarao More'. The chief of Jawali. The most inaccessible region is Sahyadri, where it is rumoured even Timur Lane could not reach it. It is because it lay in a patch of thick jungle surrounded by high hills. Chandra Rao More had once sworn his allegiance to Shivaji Maharaj's father, Shahaji. But once he left, the Jawli chief did a volta face and declared himself an independent. His cockiness stemmed from his confidence in Jawli's invincibility. Shivaji Maharaj subdued him by reaching his gates with force. He ran but was captured and ultimately executed by Shivaji Maharaj for treason. He was the last Maval chief to succumb to Shivaji Maharaj's authority.

No comments:

Post a Comment