Stalemate at the Himalayas: India-China Talks Yield No Concrete Progress
Déjà Vu at the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation Meeting
Recent talks between External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar and his Chinese counterpart Wang Yi promised a "redoubling of efforts" to resolve the ongoing border standoff in eastern Ladakh. However, this declaration rings hollow in light of similar unfulfilled commitments made during the prolonged dispute. Their pronouncements seem more like platitudes than a genuine push for progress.
Building on the Border: Infrastructure Race and Strategic Villages
The deep-seated distrust between the two nations is evident in their competitive development of border villages. India's decision to establish settlements closer to the LAC mirrors China's strategy of building over 600 "prosperous villages" (Xiaokang) along the border. These villages serve a dual purpose – bolstering territorial claims and enhancing military preparedness.
India's countermeasure, the ambitious Vibrant Villages Programme, aims to improve infrastructure and amenities in border areas. This initiative, encompassing nearly 3,000 villages, has a strategic objective: to empower villagers to act as sentinels for the Indian army.
The current trajectory suggests a continuation of the status quo – a tense standoff punctuated by unfulfilled promises of progress
CROWD SECURITY:Preventing Future Stampedes After Hathras
A Cycle of Tragedy and Missed Opportunities
The recent stampede in Hathras, claiming over 120 lives during a religious gathering, tragically underscores our national failing: the inability to learn from past disasters. These events are often met with knee-jerk reactions and temporary fixes, followed by a return to complacency until the next catastrophe strikes. Our policies lack the urgency for long-term, proactive measures to prevent such avoidable tragedies.
The Naina Devi Stampede: A Cautionary Tale Unheeded
The 2008 Naina Devi temple stampede, where 146 devotees perished due to a landslide rumor, serves as a stark example. While some improvements were made in crowd control – like implementing a batch system for pilgrims and enhancing safety measures – the story doesn't end there. Many recommendations from the investigative committee remain unimplemented, even after 16 years.
Leadership in Crisis: Empathy, Accountability, and Action
Offering substantial compensation to victims' families is a crucial aspect of leadership during crisis – it demonstrates empathy and a sense of accountability. Regardless of political affiliation, a thorough investigation into administrative lapses is essential to ensure justice and prevent similar occurrences.
Building a Robust Safety Net: Strategies for Effective Crowd Management
Moving forward, authorities must prioritize robust crowd management strategies. These include adhering to venue capacity limitations, implementing effective emergency response plans, deploying sufficient security and medical personnel, and utilizing real-time monitoring through CCTV cameras and clear communication channels.
We owe it to the victims of these stampedes to ensure their deaths are not in vain.
DIGITAL SECURITY: The Rise and Fall of Koo: A Cautionary Tale for Indian Startups
A Promising Start: A Local Voice in a Globalized World
KOO, once touted as the Indian Twitter alternative, has shuttered its doors after battling a challenging funding environment. Launched in 2020 by Aprameya Radhakrishna and Mayank Bidawatka, Koo aimed to empower Indian users to connect in their native languages, potentially disrupting Twitter's hold on the Indian market. The platform garnered early promise, boasting 2.1 million daily active users at its peak.
Riding the Wave of Digital Nationalism
KOO's launch coincided with India's push for "Atmanirbhar Bharat" (Self-reliant India) in the digital space. It gained significant traction during a government-Twitter standoff over content regulation. High-profile figures, including government officials and celebrities, flocked to the platform, giving it an air of legitimacy. The vision of a hyper-local, multilingual social media space resonated with many users seeking a platform that catered to their linguistic preferences.
Stumbling Blocks: Political Leanings and Funding Challenges
However, Koo's journey wasn't without roadblocks.The platform faced criticism for becoming a haven for right-wing discourse, which alienated a significant portion of potential users. Additionally, Koo's over-dependence on external funding proved to be a critical weakness. The prolonged funding winter and failed acquisition talks with major internet companies severely hampered its ability to sustain operations.
Funding Woes and Market Pressures: A Recipe for Failure
Despite securing $30 million in funding led by Tiger Global, Koo struggled to maintain its growth momentum. The platform's technical prowess and user-centric design couldn't overcome the challenge of attracting a user base large enough to offset operational costs. Coupled with a harsh market environment, this ultimately led to Koo's demise.
A Sobering Reminder for Aspiring Start ups
KOO's shutdown serves as a cautionary tale for aspiring Indian start ups. Its story highlights the crucial role of sustainable funding models, the need for market adaptability, and the immense difficulty of dethroning established tech giants. As Radhakrishna and Bidawatka bid farewell, Koo's legacy will be remembered as a bold experiment and a sobering reminder in the ever-evolving Indian digital landscape
No comments:
Post a Comment