Total Pageviews

Friday 22 December 2023

Disruptions: The New Democracy-2.0-Gen NITIN P GADKARI-DEC 21

 


The Winter session of parliament is recording new lows in the happenings in the parliament. It hurts every citizen to see their elected representatives stoop to the lowest levels of public behaviour. The government responds like an authority with no option but what is stated in the rule book. The stalemate is detrimental to the Indian democratic norms. Will it change? It is anybody’s guess. Yet, to highlight this dilemma, the piece is written below. It has national security implications, too, as every breach in the parliament is a tool in the hands of the ‘Enemy of our State’. I hope the readers would at least tacitly agree with what has been expressed. Do read. Thank You.

Disruptions: The New Democracy-2.0

Is the Indian democracy losing its essence? The fundamental principle of democracy is the government of the people, by the people, and for the people seems to be fading in contemporary India. While elections symbolise a functioning democracy, refusal to accept the popular mandate by a few raises questions about the democratic process. In a democracy, the government is a function of the people through the ballot. But if a section of society refuses to accept the constitutional process followed by an incumbent government, does it not erode the pillars of democracy?

The above dilemma seems to be haunting the Indian state more and more every passing day. A political party could win elections yet find it difficult to govern, as the other political parties refuse to accept the functioning of the executive. The Legislature, Executive, and Judiciary are the three pillars of a functioning democracy. The task of the three pillars is to create conditions for its citizens to live better and prosper. These organs of the state are independent of each other yet are expected to work towards the common goal of the welfare of its citizens.

Non-Productivity in Parliament

In the system of multiparty democracy, the legislature (The Lok Sabha, Rajya Sabha and the Parliament) plays a vital role as it represents the will of the power through the electorate. The business of the houses is conducted through laid down guidelines. The parliament legislates how the country is governed based on the 'Constitution and Directive Principles of the State Policy'. The parliament, therefore, is called the seat of power in a democracy. Lately, the parliament has become a place of expressing dissent, leading to disruptions. In every session of parliament, functional democracy becomes a spectacle of political conflict that rages between the ruling and the opposition benches. The business of the House of debating on the performance and introduction of new bills becomes a mere agenda on paper as the time that is needed to debate and discuss is wasted in protests and a Tug-of-War contest between the treasury and opposition benches. Each section throws charges against the other and holds the other side responsible for the chaos that descends the houses. The budget session of 2023-24, i.e. the current year, was the worst in the last five years and the second worst in the previous ten years.

 

In terms of hours in the budget session of 2023, out of the allotted 140 hours of scheduled work, the Lok Sabha functioned for only 46 hours, which is 33% of the scheduled time, and the Rajya Sabha functioned for 32 hours, which is 24% of the scheduled time. The legislative productivity was more dismal. Legislative productivity is defined as introducing, debating, negating or accepting bills in the parliament. In the Lok Sabha, the legislative business amounted to 1.1% in productivity and Zero per cent in the Rajya Sabha. The non-legislative business for Budget Session 2023 took the lion's share of the parliament's time. Refer chart given below:

 

 

Erosion of Faith

 

The above demonstrates the erosion of the sanctity of parliament over the years. There is a growing feeling that politics has degenerated to abysmally low levels; consequently, for the political parties and their members, it is a norm to defy all moral codes of conduct of public behaviour. The slogan 'You may win the votes but can never govern' is gaining credence. Time and again, this slogan's truism has been on display. Be it the farm bill, the UCC, or the CAA & NRC. The opposition parties have not allowed the government to pass any of these except the CAA. The opposition claims the blocking was because the Bill's introduction was without any prior debate. Their contention is that in its current form, the bills are fraught with dangers, for they seek to take away from citizens their fundamental rights. Many of these bills have invited widespread demonstrations in various parts of the country. Opposition parties have followed a simple formula: What cannot be stopped in the parliament is opposed on the streets. Thus, the process of legislation and execution both have obstacles for the government to surmount.

 

The above has eroded the functioning of democracy in our country. Who is to take the blame? It would be unwise to blame the opposition every time for the fiasco that occurs every day on the streets or in parliament. There needs to be more common ground between the opposition and the government. Neither is willing to concede any ground. By the power of numbers in the two houses of the parliament, the government bulldozes with the passing of bills without debate. On the other hand, opposition through disruptions and civil disturbances obstructs the smooth implementation of the bills passed. The opposition's agenda to restrict the current ruling dispensation from returning to power in the next elections results in unsavoury methods, leading to conflict and chaos.

 

If the gathering of the opposition parties under the INDIA banner gives them hope to fight the ruling dispensation in the next general elections, the defeat of the main opposition parties in the recent four state elections dampens their spirits. Such opposing outcomes make matters worse. As seen in this year's (2023) winter session in the parliament, it has resulted in an ugly situation. An unprecedented 141 opposition party members stand suspended in the parliament. Under such circumstances, any bills introduced or passed in the parliament are termed 'Draconian'. It is unfair to criticise the opposition as it is hard to justify the passage of bills without discussion. Yet it is hard to criticise the government when opposition members storm the well inside the House despite repeated warnings. Outside the parliament, opposition MPs mock the speaker of Rajya Sabha. It's 'Tamasha on the Streets' in its worst avatar. The sanctity of the parliament and the functionaries is eroded beyond repair.

 

Suspended Opposition MPs conduct mock Parliament sesssion; TMC MP Kalyan Bannerjee mimics Jagdeep Dhankhar

How does an ordinary citizen react? In sheer disgust, they remain mute spectators when their representatives mock their vote. The irony is that no mechanism is available to a commoner to direct his grievance. Citizens expect their representatives to function more civilly and see more cordial relations between political leaders across the divide. Such precedents exist when opposite party leaders wined and dined together outside the parliamentary hours. Yet, in the current political environment, such happenings are unheard of. The flip side of such politics is the erosion of Values of democracy in the minds of ordinary citizens.

 

Is there a threat to national Security?

 

Yes, there is. The happenings on 13 December 2023, the anniversary of an attack on the parliament by a youth brigade inside and outside, lay bare the chinks that exist in guarding the parliament against outside threats. Who is to be blamed for the lapse? Only time will tell if the findings of the Investigative Committee are disclosed to the public. It does not matter if the MP issuing the pass was from the ruling benches or the opposition; that the Security could be subverted is a red flag. That it's a matter of grave breach of Security is forgotten in politics. The opposition claims the breach occurred due to a lapse from a sitting ruling party MP, and the government refuses to make a statement on how the breach occurred. Result: A field day for the offenders and their Handlers. Any breach in Security is a new weapon in the armoury of the enemy of the state. It forms part of a data bank they would use someday and come to haunt the Indian state, as it happened on 07 October 2023, when Hamas surprised the best intelligence service in the world: Mossad.

 

Conclusion

 

The current state of politics in India is detrimental to the country's democratic traditions. Not only has it created a big void in the amicable business of the state in the parliament, it has resulted in the government's lack of implementation of well-intentioned reforms on the ground. There is a constant lack of consensus on parliamentary affairs. Daily disruptions are leading to the suspension of the MPs. The suspension reduces the strength of the House. It lowers the power and intent of the parliament, which flourishes in debate and discussions. Lowering or lessening the debates is detrimental to parliamentary democracy. Daily new lows in the MPs' behaviour erode the people's confidence in the functioning of democracy. Both the government and the opposition are responsible. The government is more complicit in this matter than the opposition. Being the bigger authority, it must show more accommodation than the opposition. But simple principles of dignity which apply to ordinary citizens scarcely apply to authorities. Power is the ultimate aphrodisiac. It doesn't matter at what cost it comes. Amidst this, the common man continues to repose faith in democracy. God forbid if it is lost, it would take many ‘Springs’ to gain it

No comments:

Post a Comment