Total Pageviews

Monday 28 March 2011

NUCLEAR POWER I AM NOT WORRIED

This post is by a research scientist in Menlo Park, California. He is a PhD  Scientist, whose has extensive experience in the industry. I asked him to   write this information. It is a few hours old, so if any information is out   of date, blame me for the delay in getting it out. This is his text in full   and unedited. It is very long, so get comfy.

  Why I am not worried about Japan’s nuclear reactors

  I am writing this text (Mar 12) to give you some peace of mind regarding   some of the troubles in Japan, that is the safety of Japan’s nuclear   reactors. Up front, the situation is serious, but under control. And this   text is long! But you will know more about nuclear power plants after   reading it than all journalists on this planet put together.

  There was and will *not* be any significant release of radioactivity.

  By “significant” I mean a level of radiation of more than what you would   receive on – say – a long distance flight, or drinking a glass of beer that   comes from certain areas with high levels of natural background radiation.

  I have been reading every news release on the incident since the   earthquake. There has not been one single (!) report that was accurate and  free of errors (and part of that problem is also a weakness in the Japanese crisis communication). By “not free of errors” I do not refer to  tendentious anti-nuclear journalism – that is quite normal these days. By  “not free of errors” I mean blatant errors regarding physics and natural
  law, as well as gross misinterpretation of facts, due to an obvious lack of  fundamental and basic understanding of the way nuclear reactors are build  and operated. I have read a 3 page report on CNN where every single  paragraph contained an error.

  We will have to cover some fundamentals, before we get into what is going  on.

  Construction of the Fukushima nuclear power plants

  The plants at Fukushima are so called Boiling Water Reactors, or BWR for  short. Boiling Water Reactors are similar to a pressure cooker. The nuclear  fuel heats water, the water boils and creates steam, the steam then drives
  turbines that create the electricity, and the steam is then cooled and  condensed back to water, and the water send back to be heated by the  nuclear fuel. The pressure cooker operates at about 250 °C.

  The nuclear fuel is uranium oxide. Uranium oxide is a ceramic with a very  high melting point of about 3000 °C. The fuel is manufactured in pellets  (think little cylinders the size of Lego bricks). Those pieces are then put  into a long tube made of Zircaloy with a melting point of 2200 °C, and  sealed tight. The assembly is called a fuel rod. These fuel rods are then  put together to form larger packages, and a number of these packages are  then put into the reactor. All these packages together are referred to as  “the core”.

  The Zircaloy casing is the first containment. It separates the radioactive  fuel from the rest of the world.

  The core is then placed in the “pressure vessels”. That is the pressure  cooker we talked about before. The pressure vessels is the second  containment. This is one sturdy piece of a pot, designed to safely contain  the core for temperatures several hundred °C. That covers the scenarios  where cooling can be restored at some point.

  The entire “hardware” of the nuclear reactor – the pressure vessel and all  pipes, pumps, coolant (water) reserves, are then encased in the third  containment. The third containment is a hermetically (air tight) sealed,  very thick bubble of the strongest steel and concrete. The third  containment is designed, built and tested for one single purpose: To
  contain, indefinitely, a complete core meltdown. For that purpose, a large  and thick concrete basin is cast under the pressure vessel (the second  containment), all inside the third containment. This is the so-called “core  catcher”. If the core melts and the pressure vessel bursts (and eventually  melts), it will catch the molten fuel and everything else. It is typically
  built in such a way that the nuclear fuel will be spread out, so it can  cool down.

  This third containment is then surrounded by the reactor building. The  reactor building is an outer shell that is supposed to keep the weather  out, but nothing in. (this is the part that was damaged in the explosion,  but more to that later).

  Fundamentals of nuclear reactions

  The uranium fuel generates heat by nuclear fission. Big uranium atoms are  split into smaller atoms. That generates heat plus neutrons (one of the  particles that forms an atom). When the neutron hits another uranium atom,  that splits, generating more neutrons and so on. That is called the nuclear
  chain reaction.

  Now, just packing a lot of fuel rods next to each other would quickly lead  to overheating and after about 45 minutes to a melting of the fuel rods. It  is worth mentioning at this point that the nuclear fuel in a reactor can  *never* cause a nuclear explosion the type of a nuclear bomb. Building a
  nuclear bomb is actually quite difficult (ask Iran). In Chernobyl, the  explosion was caused by excessive pressure buildup, hydrogen explosion and  rupture of all containments, propelling molten core material into the  environment (a “dirty bomb”). Why that did not and will not happen in
  Japan, further below.

  In order to control the nuclear chain reaction, the reactor operators use  so-called “control rods”. The control rods absorb the neutrons and kill the  chain reaction instantaneously. A nuclear reactor is built in such a way,  that when operating normally, you take out all the control rods. The  coolant water then takes away the heat (and converts it into steam and
  electricity) at the same rate as the core produces it. And you have a lot  of leeway around the standard operating point of 250°C.

  The challenge is that after inserting the rods and stopping the chain  reaction, the core still keeps producing heat. The uranium “stopped” the  chain reaction. But a number of intermediate radioactive elements are  created by the uranium during its fission process, most notably Cesium and  Iodine isotopes, i.e. radioactive versions of these elements that will
  eventually split up into smaller atoms and not be radioactive anymore.
  Those elements keep decaying and producing heat. Because they are not  regenerated any longer from the uranium (the uranium stopped decaying after  the control rods were put in), they get less and less, and so the core  cools down over a matter of days, until those intermediate radioactive
  elements are used up.

  This residual heat is causing the headaches right now.

  So the first “type” of radioactive material is the uranium in the fuel  rods, plus the intermediate radioactive elements that the uranium splits  into, also inside the fuel rod (Cesium and Iodine).

  There is a second type of radioactive material created, outside the fuel  rods. The big main difference up front: Those radioactive materials have a  very short half-life, that means that they decay very fast and split into
  non-radioactive materials. By fast I mean seconds. So if these radioactive  materials are released into the environment, yes, radioactivity was  released, but no, it is not dangerous, at all. Why? By the time you spelled  “R-A-D-I-O-N-U-C-L-I-D-E”, they will be harmless, because they will have  split up into non radioactive elements. Those radioactive elements are
  N-16, the radioactive isotope (or version) of nitrogen (air). The others  are noble gases such as Argon. But where do they come from? When the  uranium splits, it generates a neutron (see above). Most of these neutrons  will hit other uranium atoms and keep the nuclear chain reaction going. But
  some will leave the fuel rod and hit the water molecules, or the air that  is in the water. Then, a non-radioactive element can “capture” the neutron.
  It becomes radioactive. As described above, it will quickly (seconds) get  rid again of the neutron to return to its former beautiful self.

  This second “type” of radiation is very important when we talk about the  radioactivity being released into the environment later on.

  What happened at Fukushima

  I will try to summarize the main facts. The earthquake that hit Japan was 5  times more powerful than the worst earthquake the nuclear power plant was  built for (the Richter scale works logarithmically; the difference between  the 8.2 that the plants were built for and the 8.9 that happened is 5  times, not 0.7). So the first hooray for Japanese engineering, everything
  held up.

  When the earthquake hit with 8.9, the nuclear reactors all went into  automatic shutdown. Within seconds after the earthquake started, the  control rods had been inserted into the core and nuclear chain reaction of  the uranium stopped. Now, the cooling system has to carry away the residual  heat. The residual heat load is about 3% of the heat load under normal
  operating conditions.

  The earthquake destroyed the external power supply of the nuclear reactor.  That is one of the most serious accidents for a nuclear power plant, and  accordingly, a “plant black out” receives a lot of attention when designing  backup systems. The power is needed to keep the coolant pumps working.
  Since the power plant had been shut down, it cannot produce any electricity  by itself any more.

  Things were going well for an hour. One set of multiple sets of emergency  Diesel power generators kicked in and provided the electricity that was  needed. Then the Tsunami came, much bigger than people had expected when  building the power plant (see above, factor 7). The tsunami took out all
  multiple sets of backup Diesel generators.

  When designing a nuclear power plant, engineers follow a philosophy called  “Defense of Depth”. That means that you first build everything to withstand  the worst catastrophe you can imagine, and then design the plant in such a  way that it can still handle one system failure (that you thought could
  never happen) after the other. A tsunami taking out all backup power in one  swift strike is such a scenario. The last line of defense is putting  everything into the third containment (see above), that will keep  everything, whatever the mess, control rods in our out, core molten or not,  inside the reactor.

  When the diesel generators were gone, the reactor operators switched to  emergency battery power. The batteries were designed as one of the backups  to the backups, to provide power for cooling the core for 8 hours. And they  did.

  Within the 8 hours, another power source had to be found and connected to  the power plant. The power grid was down due to the earthquake. The diesel  generators were destroyed by the tsunami. So mobile diesel generators were  trucked in.

  This is where things started to go seriously wrong. The external power  generators could not be connected to the power plant (the plugs did not  fit). So after the batteries ran out, the residual heat could not be  carried away any more.

  At this point the plant operators begin to follow emergency procedures that  are in place for a “loss of cooling event”. It is again a step along the  “Depth of Defense” lines. The power to the cooling systems should never  have failed completely, but it did, so they “retreat” to the next line of  defense. All of this, however shocking it seems to us, is part of the  day-to-day training you go through as an operator, right through to
  managing a core meltdown.

  It was at this stage that people started to talk about core meltdown.  Because at the end of the day, if cooling cannot be restored, the core will  eventually melt (after hours or days), and the last line of defense, the  core catcher and third containment, would come into play.

  But the goal at this stage was to manage the core while it was heating up,  and ensure that the first containment (the Zircaloy tubes that contains the  nuclear fuel), as well as the second containment (our pressure cooker)  remain intact and operational for as long as possible, to give the  engineers time to fix the cooling systems.

  Because cooling the core is such a big deal, the reactor has a number of  cooling systems, each in multiple versions (the reactor water cleanup  system, the decay heat removal, the reactor core isolating cooling, the  standby liquid cooling system, and the emergency core cooling system).
  Which one failed when or did not fail is not clear at this point in time.

  So imagine our pressure cooker on the stove, heat on low, but on. The  operators use whatever cooling system capacity they have to get rid of as  much heat as possible, but the pressure starts building up. The priority  now is to maintain integrity of the first containment (keep temperature of
  the fuel rods below 2200°C), as well as the second containment, the  pressure cooker. In order to maintain integrity of the pressure cooker (the  second containment), the pressure has to be released from time to time.
  Because the ability to do that in an emergency is so important, the reactor  has 11 pressure release valves. The operators now started venting steam  from time to time to control the pressure. The temperature at this stage
  was about 550°C.

  This is when the reports about “radiation leakage” starting coming in. I  believe I explained above why venting the steam is theoretically the same  as releasing radiation into the environment, but why it was and is not  dangerous. The radioactive nitrogen as well as the noble gases do not pose
  a threat to human health.

  At some stage during this venting, the explosion occurred. The explosion  took place outside of the third containment (our “last line of defense”),  and the reactor building. Remember that the reactor building has no  function in keeping the radioactivity contained. It is not entirely clear  yet what has happened, but this is the likely scenario: The operators
  decided to vent the steam from the pressure vessel not directly into the  environment, but into the space between the third containment and the  reactor building (to give the radioactivity in the steam more time to  subside). The problem is that at the high temperatures that the core had  reached at this stage, water molecules can “disassociate” into oxygen and
  hydrogen – an explosive mixture. And it did explode, outside the third  containment, damaging the reactor building around. It was that sort of  explosion, but inside the pressure vessel (because it was badly designed  and not managed properly by the operators) that lead to the explosion of  Chernobyl. This was never a risk at Fukushima. The problem of  hydrogen-oxygen formation is one of the biggies when you design a power  plant (if you are not Soviet, that is), so the reactor is build and  operated in a way it cannot happen inside the containment. It happened  outside, which was not intended but a possible scenario and OK, because it  did not pose a risk for the containment.

  So the pressure was under control, as steam was vented. Now, if you keep  boiling your pot, the problem is that the water level will keep falling and  falling. The core is covered by several meters of water in order to allow  for some time to pass (hours, days) before it gets exposed. Once the rods  start to be exposed at the top, the exposed parts will reach the critical
  temperature of 2200 °C after about 45 minutes. This is when the first  containment, the Zircaloy tube, would fail.

  And this started to happen. The cooling could not be restored before there  was some (very limited, but still) damage to the casing of some of the  fuel. The nuclear material itself was still intact, but the surrounding  Zircaloy shell had started melting. What happened now is that some of the  byproducts of the uranium decay – radioactive Cesium and Iodine – started
  to mix with the steam. The big problem, uranium, was still under control,  because the uranium oxide rods were good until 3000 °C. It is confirmed  that a very small amount of Cesium and Iodine was measured in the steam  that was released into the atmosphere.

  It seems this was the “go signal” for a major plan B. The small amounts of  Cesium that were measured told the operators that the first containment on  one of the rods somewhere was about to give. The Plan A had been to restore
  one of the regular cooling systems to the core. Why that failed is unclear.
  One plausible explanation is that the tsunami also took away / polluted all  the clean water needed for the regular cooling systems.

  The water used in the cooling system is very clean, demineralized (like  distilled) water. The reason to use pure water is the above mentioned  activation by the neutrons from the Uranium: Pure water does not get  activated much, so stays practically radioactive-free. Dirt or salt in the  water will absorb the neutrons quicker, becoming more radioactive. This has  no effect whatsoever on the core – it does not care what it is cooled by.
  But it makes life more difficult for the operators and mechanics when they  have to deal with activated (i.e. slightly radioactive) water.

  But Plan A had failed – cooling systems down or additional clean water  unavailable – so Plan B came into effect. This is what it looks like  happened:

  In order to prevent a core meltdown, the operators started to use sea water  to cool the core. I am not quite sure if they flooded our pressure cooker  with it (the second containment), or if they flooded the third containment,  immersing the pressure cooker. But that is not relevant for us.

  The point is that the nuclear fuel has now been cooled down. Because the  chain reaction has been stopped a long time ago, there is only very little  residual heat being produced now. The large amount of cooling water that  has been used is sufficient to take up that heat. Because it is a lot of  water, the core does not produce sufficient heat any more to produce any
  significant pressure. Also, boric acid has been added to the seawater.
  Boric acid is “liquid control rod”. Whatever decay is still going on, the  Boron will capture the neutrons and further speed up the cooling down of  the core.

  The plant came close to a core meltdown. Here is the worst-case scenario  that was avoided: If the seawater could not have been used for treatment,  the operators would have continued to vent the water steam to avoid  pressure buildup. The third containment would then have been completely
  sealed to allow the core meltdown to happen without releasing radioactive  material. After the meltdown, there would have been a waiting period for  the intermediate radioactive materials to decay inside the reactor, and all  radioactive particles to settle on a surface inside the containment. The
  cooling system would have been restored eventually, and the molten core  cooled to a manageable temperature. The containment would have been cleaned  up on the inside. Then a messy job of removing the molten core from the containment would have begun, packing the (now solid again) fuel bit by bit
  into transportation containers to be shipped to processing plants.
  Depending on the damage, the block of the plant would then either be  repaired or dismantled.

  Now, where does that leave us?

    ● The plant is safe now and will stay safe.
    ● Japan is looking at an INES Level 4 Accident: Nuclear accident with      local consequences. That is bad for the company that owns the plant, but not for anyone else.
    ● Some radiation was released when the pressure vessel was vented. All      radioactive isotopes from the activated steam have gone (decayed). A very small amount of Cesium was released, as well as Iodine. If you  were sitting on top of the plants’ chimney when they were venting, you  should probably give up smoking to return to your former life      expectancy. The Cesium and Iodine isotopes were carried out to the sea and will never be seen again.
    ● There was some limited damage to the first containment. That means that  some amounts of radioactive Cesium and Iodine will also be released     into the cooling water, but no Uranium or other nasty stuff (the      Uranium oxide does not “dissolve” in the water). There are facilities      for treating the cooling water inside the third containment. The      radioactive Cesium and Iodine will be removed there and eventually     stored as radioactive waste in terminal storage.
    ● The seawater used as cooling water will be activated to some degree.
      Because the control rods are fully inserted, the Uranium chain reaction is not happening. That means the “main” nuclear reaction is not     happening, thus not contributing to the activation. The intermediate      radioactive materials (Cesium and Iodine) are also almost gone at this stage, because the Uranium decay was stopped a long time ago. This
      further reduces the activation. The bottom line is that there will be   some low level of activation of the seawater, which will also be   removed by the treatment facilities.
    ● The seawater will then be replaced over time with the “normal” cooling   water
    ● The reactor core will then be dismantled and transported to a processing facility, just like during a regular fuel change.
    ● Fuel rods and the entire plant will be checked for potential damage.  This will take about 4-5 years.
    ● The safety systems on all Japanese plants will be upgraded to withstand  a 9.0 earthquake and tsunami (or worse)
    ● I believe the most significant problem will be a prolonged power shortage. About half of Japan’s nuclear reactors will probably have to  be inspected, reducing the nation’s power generating capacity by 15%.
      This will probably be covered by running gas power plants that are usually only used for peak loads to cover some of the base load as well. That will increase your electricity bill, as well as lead to potential power shortages during peak demand, in Japan.

No comments:

Post a Comment