SPREAD MESSAGE OF INDIAN NATIONAL SECURITY TO AS MANY INDIANS AS POSSIBLE. LET US FREE INDIA OF CORRUPTION BY SPREADING THE MESSAGE TO AS MANY PEOPLE.MANY OF THE ARTICLES HAVE BEEN RECEIVED AS FORWARDED MAIL FROM VARIOUS FRIENDS . SHOULD SOME FACTS BE NOT CORRECT , YOU ARE REQUESTED TO PUT IT IN REMARKS BELOW THE ARTICLE. THIS WILL ENSURE A MORE BALANCED PERSPECTIVE OF THE SUBJECT DISCUSSED.
Tuesday, 27 September 2016
MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2016
After a talk to a student-group where I criticised Nehru and his Commie policies and practices I was asked an interesting question by someone who appeared to be a big fan of his. “You criticise Nehru harshly but isn’t it Nehru who established democracy in India”? Such is the brainwashing of heads by Commies that there are people who actually think without Nehru there would be no democracy in India. All the others who were in Parliament or who fought for our independence were just sidekicks and would have turned India into a dictatorship. And the Indus Water Treaty (IWT) that is being discussed widely after the Uri terror-attacks again shows the sloppiness of Nehru’s thinking and lack of vision. Most legacies of Nehru lie in shambles. His era was one when Commies had a free run in establishing their dominance, bogus history and starting the running down of Hindu culture as a whole. There is no real right wing political party in India but there are individuals and non-political groups who are. Here are tweets that summarise the battle that’s been raging for a long time:
If you’re wondering why this is so, the answer is simple. For long the RW has been battling the lies and propaganda of Commies and therefore the burden of bringing out facts and truth weighs more heavily on them. The Commies (including Congress) could get away with any lie and propaganda. And the fact that a non-Congress govt with full majority is now at the Centre still upsets the whole establishment and media. A traitor is someone who betrays another, a group, a cause or a nation. Individuals and small groups may not matter much but when you play into the hands of the enemy of a nation then such treachery shouldn’t be tolerated even one inch. Post the Uri attack PM Modi acknowledged one important aspect of terrorism – Terror support services:
A good chunk of our Commie media is part of this “Eco system” that Modi mentions. While a whole people await action against Pakistan, they are willing to wait a while to see how events unfold. But these traitors amongst us are proactive enough to rave and rant so much that they want to ensure no action against Pakistan is taken at all. It seems in the 10 years of UPA the Sonia-govt made absolutely no effort to modernise our weaponry. Any effort towards that was also mired in nothing but more and more corruption and scams. Not surprisingly, in a recent rally in Moradabad the Congress foot-soldiers were shouting “Pakistan Zindabad”. This is the Nehru-legacy (video 17 secs):
Long back, Congi filth-generator Manishankar Aiyar stated on a Pak channel that Modi must be ousted for peace between Pak and India. I consider the current Congress a greater enemy of India along with their Commie alliance partners. That’s a political party with their goons supporting an enemy that kills our soldiers and civilians. The voters will deal them a hand as they did in 2014. But the onus is on Modi to deal with other traitors amongst us – particularly in the corrupt and India-hating media. Look at this guy – I call him “Father Teresa”. No matter what the atrocity by Pak terrorists Sudheendra Kulkarni keeps preaching peace with Pak. What motivates his reckless nonsense? I guess paid junkets and luxury holidays by Pak or ISI must be a strong incentive:
Yes, indeed! The grass is definitely greener on the other side when the green-expense is being borne by the sponsors of anti-India campaigns whether terrorism or hatred. And Kulkarni is just one of them. There is this Pak-loving couple who have such intense hatred for Indians (particularly Hindus) that they would indulge in extreme levels of stupidity beyond belief to promote the cause of our enemy. It’s tragically hilarious. Here’s Rajdeep ranting and whining on a Pak channel about how some Indian TV channels and anchors are into war-mongering (the obvious reference being to Arnab Goswami and Timesnow – video 51 secs):
I have been strongly against Paki idiots being given space on Indian TV or any media platform to vent their nonsense and abuse India. However, from the HT summit to Paki pimps on NDTV, CNN-IBN and others, their eternal darling has been Parvez Musharraf who is the “war-criminal” of Kargil. So what is Rajdeep whining about? And the best part is, these Pakis on our channels are very loyal to their country unlike Rajdeep and others who spew hatred for India and Indians on Pak channels. That’s what traitors do:
And as a consequence of the hatred that Rajdeep and others pour against India and Indians on Pak channels, elements in that country are goaded to file cases against our anchors. Whether one likes Arnab or not, he has indeed become a “hyper-nationalist” loathed by these Sickular Paki-pimps. Rajdeep himself has many times invited the same Pakis on his channel to abuse India:
And their strident conflict with Arnab’s style of anti-Pak discourse will end up posing a threat to Arnab’s life itself. If Hafiz “Saab” is so enamoured by the loyalty of Barkha Dutt there is no reason to believe some loose-change terrorist will be inspired to have a go at Arnab because these Paki-pimps, see him destroying their cause. And if the Monk is blabbering disgraceful nonsense on a Pak channel can the moron be far behind? Here you go:
Borrowing from the “Monkey Balancing” concept of her hubby, Sagarika desperately wants to equate the failed state of Pak with the thriving democracy of India. And in the second tweet she again proves she’s the “Sergei Bubka of moronery”. She compares domestic incidents with terror-related issues and asks if the world should deny visas for it. Someone pointed out to this moron that actions like those of Rajdeep at MSG might warrant a visa-denial. So, in short, these traitors want India to do nothing about Pak in retaliation to terror-attacks for over 25 years. Don’t take military action, don’t cut-off bilateral ties, don’t abrogate Indus water treaty, don’t ban Paki artists or hate-mongers. Just do nothing and sit back and let our soldiers be killed. Here’s the Chief Pak-Rudaali trying best to thwart any action against Pak:
These morons simply don’t get it. A retaliation of any kind need not necessarily mean terrorism will stop. Is that good enough reason to do nothing? When Aamir Khan ranted about “Intolerance” folks on SM targeted Snapdeal and campaigned to boycott the online retailer. Consequently,Snapdeal had to drop the contract with Aamir Khan. That’s what a ban or boycott does. It forces those losing profitable jobs or contracts to send a message to their govt or organisation. Banning Pak artists from India would be a message to the Pak people to petition their govt and that if their govt does not stop terrorism they would be unwelcome in India. Such simple logic is not lost on morons like Barkha and the others. It is just that they don’t want their darling Pak, Pak terrorists or any Paki to suffer regardless of the deaths of Indian soldiers. Barkha even goes further. She rounds up a bunch of her sidekicks, conducts a debate and tweets a grand conclusion that she is reassured nobody wants to scrap the IWT:
I have no doubts Pakistan will be dismembered and destroyed. It’s a mathematical fact. But like I stated earlier in the post, now that Modi recognises the “eco-system” of terrorists and their supporters, he must first work to destroy these traitors. These traitors want India destroyed. Their Commie ideology wants “Bharat Ke Tukde” and particularly complete destruction of the Hindu culture. Modi has done the right thing in recognising this internal enemy first. We can wait a bit more for Pakistan to die. These traitors need to be attended first.
India is not merely facing terrorism. India is at a crossroads facing a major crisis of confidence. And in such a crisis it is the character-less rats and traitors that show up first to defend the indefensible