INDIA AGAINST CORRUPTION & BAD GOVERNANCE STORY 64
WILL PUBLISH ARTICLES REGULARLY ON CORRUPTION / BAD GOVERNANCE IN INDIA . PASS ON TO AS MAY HONEST INDIANS AS POSSIBLE
http://brighemantmahajan.blogspot.com/One can go in for a PIL in the supreme Court with this.Sunder
'Politically Exposed Persons' Law to Expose Indian Leaders
Since we are talking of the recovery of more than a trillion US dollars of the nation's wealth, as also the opportunity of exposing / shaming / punishing the individuals involved, isn't it well worth pursuing ? The opportunity has come about after the Swiss have enacted the act in October 2010. May be the people concerned have yet to react. I hope that they do sooner than later
English is not an official language of the Swiss Confederation. This translation is providedfor information purposes only and has no legal force.
Federal Acton the Restitution of Assets of Politically Exposed Personsobtained by Unlawful MeansRestitution of Illicit Assets Act (RIAA)of 1 October 2010The Federal Assembly of the Swiss Confederation,based on Article 54 paragraph 1 of the Federal Constitution1, andhaving examined the Federal Council Dispatch of 28 April 20102,decrees:Section 1: Subject MatterArt. 1The present Act governs the freezing, forfeiture and restitution of assets of politicallyexposed persons or their close associates in cases where a request for mutual assistance incriminal matters cannot produce an outcome owing to the failure of state structures in therequesting state in which the politically exposed person exercises or exercised office(country of origin).Section 2: Freezing of AssetsArt. 2 ConditionsThe Federal Council may order the freezing of assets in Switzerland with a view to theinstigation of forfeiture proceedings under this Act, providing the following conditionsare fulfilled:a. The assets have been secured provisionally in the context of a process of mutualassistance in criminal matters instigated at the request of the country of origin.b. Powers of disposal over the assets rest with:1. individuals who exercise or have exercised a high public office abroad (politicallyexposed persons). This category includes specifically heads of stateor government, high-ranking politicians, high-ranking members of the administration,judiciary, armed forces or national political parties, and seniorexecutives of state-owned corporations of national importance, or2. natural or legal persons who are closely associated with politically exposedpersons for family, personal or business reasons (close associates).c. The country of origin is unable to satisfy the requirements of legal assistance proceedingsowing to the total or substantial collapse, or the unavailability, of its nationaljudicial system (failure of state structures).d. The safeguarding of Swiss interests demands that the assets be frozen.1 SR 1012 Federal Gazette 2010 29952Art. 3 Duration1 Assets remain frozen until a legally binding ruling on their forfeiture is made.2 If no forfeiture proceedings are instigated within ten years of the freezing ordertaking effect, the freeze shall be lifted.Art. 4 Amicable settlement1 The Federal Council may instruct the Federal Department of Foreign Affairs(FDFA), while the asset freeze is in force, to seek an amicable settlement that permitsthe full or partial restitution of the frozen assets. Articles 8–10 apply by analogyto such restitution.2 The amicable settlement must be approved by the Federal Council.3 If the Federal Council approves the amicable settlement, the asset freeze shall belifted.Section 3: ForfeitureArt. 5 Procedure1 At the request of the FDFA, the Federal Council may instruct the Federal Departmentof Finance (FDF) to take legal action before the Federal Administrative Courtto enable frozen assets to be forfeited.2 The Federal Administrative Court shall decide on the forfeiture of assets on thebasis of the following criteria:a. The power of disposal is held by a politically exposed person or his or herclose associates;b. They have been obtained by unlawful means; andc. They have been frozen by the Federal Council pursuant to this Act.3 No statute of limitations in respect of criminal prosecution or penalties may beinvoked.4 Should mutual legal assistance proceedings in criminal matters resume, forfeitureproceedings shall be suspended until a legally binding ruling has been issued inrespect of the legal assistance proceedings.Art. 6 Presumption of unlawful origin1 The presumption that assets are of unlawful origin applies wherea. the wealth of the person who holds powers of disposal over the assets hasbeen subject to an extraordinary increase that is connected with the exerciseof a public office by the politically exposed person; andb. the level of corruption in the country of origin or surrounding the politicallyexposed person in question during their term of office is or was acknowledgedas high.Restitution of Assets Act32 The presumption ceases to apply if it can be demonstrated that in all probability theassets were acquired by lawful means.Art. 7 Third-party rightsThe following categories of asset may not be seized:a. those over which a Swiss authority can lay claim;b. those to which a person who is not a close associate of the politically exposedperson has acquired rights in rem in good faith:1. in Switzerland, or2. abroad, if they are the object of a judicial decision which can be recognisedin Switzerland.Section 4: RestitutionArt. 8 PrincipleThe objectives of the restitution of forfeited assets are the following:a. to improve the living conditions of the people of the country of origin, orb. to strengthen the Rule of Law in the country of origin and to fight theimpunity of criminals.Art. 9 Procedure1 Seized assets shall be returned in the form of financing for programmes of publicinterest.2 The details of restitution may be governed by an agreement between Switzerlandand the country of origin.3 Such an agreement may govern, in particulara. the nature of the programmes of public interest that are to be financed by theassets that have been returned;b. the way in which the returned assets are to be used;c. the parties involved in restitution;d. checks and monitoring with regard to how the returned assets are being used.4 The Federal Council is responsible for concluding such an agreement.5 If no agreement can be reached with the country of origin, the Federal Councilitself shall determine the process of restitution. In particular, it may return the forfeitedassets via international or national institutions and order supervision by theFDFA.4Art. 10 Procedural costs1 A flat-rate charge of no more than 2.5 per cent of the seized assets may be debitedfor the account of the Confederation or the cantons to cover the costs of freezing andreturning the assets.2 The Federal Council shall determine this flat-rate charge on a case-by-case basis.Section 5: Legal Redress and Cooperation between AuthoritiesArt. 11 Appeal1 Orders issued by the Federal Council to freeze assets may be challenged by anappeal to the Federal Administrative Court.2 The appeal does not have a suspensive effect. Article 55 paragraph 2 of the FederalAct of 20 December 1968 on Administrative Procedure3 does not apply.3 No objection may be raised on the grounds of unreasonableness.4 Proceedings and means of legal redress are otherwise governed by the generalprovisions on the administration of justice at federal level.Art. 12 Cooperation between authorities1 The Federal Office of Justice shall notify the FDFA when a request for mutuallegal assistance in criminal matters concerning assets frozen in Switzerland of politicallyexposed persons or their close associates has proven unsuccessful.2 At the request of the FDFA or the FDF, federal and cantonal authorities mustprovide all such information as is required to enforce this Act.Section 6: Final ProvisionsArt. 13 Amendments to current lawAmendments to current law are set out in the Appendix.Art. 14 Transitional provisions1 Assets already frozen on the commencement of this Act on the basis of a FederalCouncil order issued pursuant to Article 184 paragraph 3 of the Federal Constitution,because a request for mutual legal assistance in criminal matters has proven unsuccessful,shall remain frozen until a decision on their forfeiture enters into force inaccordance with this Act.2 The asset freeze shall be lifted if forfeiture proceedings have not been instigatedwithin one year of the entry into force of this Act.3 Federal Act on Administrative Procedure, SR 172.021Restitution of Assets Act5Art. 15 Referendum and commencement1 This Act is subject to an optional referendum.2 The Federal Council shall determine the commencement date.6Annex(Art. 13)Amendments to current lawThe following federal acts are amended as described below:1. Federal Act of 17 June 2005 on the Federal Administrative Court4Art. 33 b point. 3Appeals are permissible against rulings:b. of the Federal Council concerning:3. the freezing of assets pursuant to the Federal Act of 1 October 2010 onthe Restitution of Assets of Politically Exposed Persons Obtained byUnlawful Means5;Art. 35 dThe Federal Administrative Court shall rule as the court of first instance on thefollowing subjects of legal action:d. petitions for the forfeiture of assets pursuant to the Federal Act of 1 October2010 on the Restitution of Assets of Politically Exposed Persons Obtained byUnlawful Means6.Art. 44 para. 33 Court costs and compensation are governed by Articles 63–65 of the AdministrativeProcedure Act7.2. Federal Act of 11 April 1889 on Debt Collection and Bankruptcy8Art. 44Objects that have been seized under federal or cantonal criminal or fiscal law orpursuant to the Federal Act of 1 October 2010 on the Restitution of Assets of PoliticallyExposed Persons Obtained by Unlawful Means9 shall be realised in accordancewith these laws.4 Federal Act on the Federal Administrative Court , SR 173.325 SR ...6 SR ...7 Federal Act on Administrative Procedure, SR 172.0218 Federal Act on Debt Collection and Bankruptcy, SR 281.19 SR ...Restitution of Assets Act7
No comments:
Post a Comment