Chinese officials often say that Beijing does not
deliberately seek a trade surplus. Deliberate or not, China’s trade imbalances
are not sustainable for the rest of the world, and China should not be
surprised if foreign governments start to respond more aggressively. Beijing is
likely to reject measures similar to those the United States and its partners
adopted in the 1980s to address Japan’s trade imbalances, such as an exchange
rate arrangement resembling the Plaza Accords or Louvre Accords. Tariff hikes
on Chinese imports, another policy available to foreign governments, may only
provide temporary relief; when the Trump administration imposed such levies,
many Chinese suppliers were able to skirt these regulations by shipping goods
through third countries before they reached their final destinations in the
United States. With few effective policy options and an unwilling negotiator in
Beijing, Western governments in particular will consider increasingly draconian
restrictions on Chinese trade. That shock may be what is necessary for China to
take structural reforms seriously, for the sake of its own economic health and
in the hope of avoiding an irreparable split in global trade.
No comments:
Post a Comment