DEEP STATE PART 3-Khalistan Smokescreen: A Tool for Foreign Interference in India's Domestic Affairs

 Leveraging Khalistan for Geopolitical Pressure

The Khalistan issue, a long-standing concern for India, has emerged as a strategic leverage point for Western powers. Recent controversies, including the Australian Broadcasting Corporation’s (ABC) Four Corners report, allege Indian diplomatic interference in rooting out Khalistani networks in Australia. The report accuses Indian diplomats of espionage, leading to their expulsion, while simultaneously portraying the Australian government as prioritizing economic ties over principles. This narrative mirrors similar accusations in Canada and the United States, amplifying claims of India’s “transnational repression” under Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

Coordinated Media Narratives and Deep State Influence

The striking similarities in narratives across Anglosphere media outlets, as highlighted by The Economic Times, suggest a coordinated effort possibly orchestrated by the Five Eyes (FVEY) intelligence alliance. Disinfo Lab, an independent OSINT research organization, notes the synchronicity of events such as ABC’s report, the extradition of Nikhil Gupta to the U.S., and Canadian Parliament’s commemoration of Khalistani terrorist Hardeep Singh Nijjar. These seemingly disconnected incidents, framed under the umbrella of “transnational repression,” converge to delegitimize India’s efforts against Khalistani extremism.

The Weaponization of "Transnational Repression"

The term “transnational repression” has become a rallying cry in media and political discourse, often wielded to critique India’s actions against separatist elements abroad. The U.S. media, for instance, has criticized the Biden administration for engaging with India despite allegations against its officials. Articles in outlets like Politico call for invoking obscure laws to impose military consequences on India, underscoring the narrative’s reach and impact.

Diplomatic Engagement Amidst Allegations

Despite these narratives, diplomatic engagements between India and the West continue. Recent meetings between U.S. National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan and Indian counterpart Ajit Doval emphasized deepening defense and technology partnerships. Simultaneously, a bipartisan U.S. Congressional delegation met with Indian leaders, signaling the strategic importance of India as a counterbalance to China. However, this engagement is juxtaposed with letters from American lawmakers demanding accountability for alleged Indian involvement in foreign plots, highlighting the dual-track approach of engagement and leverage.

The Strategic Calculations of the West

India’s rise as a global power presents a challenge to Western dominance. With a young demographic, a growing economy, and aspirations for strategic autonomy, India’s trajectory disrupts traditional power dynamics. Former Indian Foreign Secretary Kanwal Sibal aptly notes that India’s pursuit of multipolarity and non-alignment impacts the West’s ability to maintain its hegemonic position. The Khalistan issue, thus, becomes a convenient tool to exert pressure while engaging India as a strategic partner.

Conclusion: Navigating the Complex Geopolitical Landscape

The interplay of media narratives, diplomatic overtures, and covert influence operations underscores the West’s complex approach toward India. While the engagement continues to counterbalance China, leveraging issues like Khalistan ensures that India remains pliable to Western interests. Recognizing and countering these tactics is essential for India to safeguard its sovereignty and assert its position on the global stage.