Total Pageviews

Tuesday, 31 December 2024

The Overthrow of Assad: A Turning Point in the Syrian Civil War-Stabilizing Syria main challenge

 


The Genesis of the Conflict and Years of Stalemate: The Syrian civil war, erupting in 2011 from pro-democracy protests against Bashar al-Assad's regime, took a dramatic turn in late 2024. Assad, who had succeeded his father Hafez al-Assad (president since 1971) in 2000, was ultimately ousted by rebel forces led by Hayat Tahrir Al-Sham (HTS). The conflict, initially sparked by Assad's violent suppression of dissent, had resulted in an estimated 500,000 deaths and years of stalemate. As 2024 began, the situation remained largely unchanged: Sunni militants controlled northeast Syria, Kurdish forces backed by the US held the northwest, and Assad maintained control over the rest, including Damascus.  

The Rebel Offensive and the Fall of Aleppo:

Renewed violence erupted in October 2024, with clashes between insurgents and government forces, compounded by Russian airstrikes. The turning point came in late November when an Islamist-led rebel alliance launched a major offensive. In a matter of days, HTS and its allies recaptured Aleppo, a strategically vital city of two million people, for the first time since the war began. This was a devastating blow to Assad, who had spent four years and inflicted immense destruction attempting to regain control of the former Syrian economic hub. Despite Syrian and Russian airstrikes on Aleppo, the rebels maintained their hold. While Russia and Iran reaffirmed their support for Assad, experts began to express serious doubts about his prospects.  

Shifting Geopolitics and Assad's Weakened Position: 

Analysts like Aron Lund of Century International suggested that the loss of Aleppo rendered Assad's government non-functional. They pointed to Russia's preoccupation with the war in Ukraine and the weakening of Iran and Hezbollah due to their conflict with Israel as key factors contributing to Assad's vulnerability. Aaron Stein of the Foreign Policy Research Institute highlighted the reduced Russian presence and the limited effectiveness of quick reaction airstrikes, underscoring the Assad regime's inherent weakness. Experts like Emile Hokayem from the International Institute for Strategic Studies noted that the rebels had used the preceding years to regroup, rearm, and retrain, capitalizing on both geopolitical shifts and local opportunities.  

The Rapid Collapse of the Regime: 

he rebel offensive triggered international calls for de-escalation, with many, including the US (which designates HTS as a terrorist group), caught off guard by the rebels' rapid advances. Emboldened by their success in Aleppo, the rebels pressed forward, capturing strategically important cities like Hama, Daraa, and Homs, effectively splitting the Assad regime in two. On December 8, rebel forces entered Damascus, proclaiming the dawn of a new Syria. Assad subsequently fled to Moscow, where he was granted asylum. Millions of Syrian refugees began expressing their intention to return home.  

International Reactions and Regional Implications: 

The Biden administration commented on the dramatic events, suggesting that US and allied actions had weakened Syria's backers—Russia, Iran, and Hezbollah. While calling Assad's fall "a fundamental act of justice" and a "moment of risk and uncertainty," Biden stated that the US would closely monitor the rebels' actions. Experts predicted significant changes in West Asia in 2025. A US official suggested that the developments in Syria signaled the collapse of "Iran's artifice" in the region. Analysts like Danny Citrinowicz of the Atlantic Council argued that Assad's demise represented a "fatal strike" on Iran's influence in the Middle East, dramatically weakening its ability to rebuild Hezbollah and threaten Israel. He concluded that Iran would need to devise a new regional strategy without relying on proxies. The future of Syria, and its impact on neighboring countries like Turkey, Iraq, Jordan, Lebanon, and Israel, remained a central focus of international attention.

Likely Escalation Civil War in Myanmar In 2025-Increased Challenges For India

 

The 2021 Coup and the Rise of Armed Resistance: 

Myanmar has been in turmoil since the 2021 military coup that ousted the democratically elected government of Aung San Suu Kyi. This action sparked widespread anger and fuelled a nationwide armed resistance movement against the junta. The fighting has intensified over the past year, with the fiercest resistance concentrated in regions populated by ethnic minorities. In these areas, various ethnic groups and civilian-led defense forces have formed alliances to challenge the military's control across significant portions of the country.

Rebel Gains and Military Setbacks:

While rebels have made progress throughout the war-torn nation, their advances are particularly notable in areas bordering China. The military has suffered a series of defeats, notably losing control of the western border with Bangladesh to the Arakan Army (AA) in December. The AA’s expulsion of the junta’s Border Guard Police (PGP5) from northern Rakhine State has given the rebels control of the entire 270-kilometer border. Only the state capital, Sittwe, remains under military control, effectively isolating it from the rest of the nation. The AA is poised to become the first insurgent group to achieve complete control of a state in Myanmar.

Humanitarian Crisis and Displacement:

The ongoing conflict has resulted in widespread devastation and human suffering. The UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, Volker Türk, reported that the military has killed over 5,000 civilians since 2021. The conflict has displaced over three million people nationwide, and approximately 18 million people – a third of the population – lack access to essential resources such as food, housing, electricity, and heating. The Rohingya population, already subjected to years of persecution, has been particularly affected. A Rohingya man described their current situation as even more difficult than under previous military juntas, with nearly 750,000 having fled to Bangladesh.

International Efforts and Future Outlook: China has advocated for a ceasefire, with two out of three members of the Brotherhood Alliance agreeing to it. While the insurgents have demanded the military's removal from politics, their primary focus may be consolidating their territorial gains. Myanmar's neighboring countries are increasingly concerned about the instability. Thailand hosted talks in December involving foreign ministers and high-level representatives from Myanmar, Laos, China, India, Bangladesh, and Thailand, aiming to resolve the political crisis. These efforts are unlikely to succeed without the military's genuine commitment to peace. The military is the root cause of the problems and warns against taking the junta's promises of future elections seriously. Aung San Suu Kyi, the 78-year-old Nobel laureate, remains under house arrest, facing a 27-year prison sentence on various charges, all of which she denies. The chief prosecutor of the International Criminal Court (ICC) has requested an arrest warrant for junta leader Min Aung Hlaing. The future of Myanmar remains uncertain, with the junta's ability to maintain control in 2025 – or even stage a comeback – in serious doubt.

CONGRATULATIONS -VAISHALI WINS A BRONZE AT FIDE World Blitz Championship 2024


 

A Comprehensive Approach to Restore Peace and Stability In Manipur In 2025

 A Complex and Escalating Crisis

Manipur exemplifies the challenges of managing an internal security problem. The state faces a volatile mix of ethnic conflicts, tribal insurgency, drug trafficking, and infiltration from Myanmar. Despite India's proven expertise in addressing internal security issues—such as countering terrorism in Punjab, containing insurgency in the Northeast, and curbing Maoist rebellion—Manipur's situation has deteriorated alarmingly.

The Current Approach: A Flawed Strategy

The Government of India has primarily treated Manipur's crisis as a law-and-order issue. The recent deployment of 90 additional Central Armed Police Forces (CAPF) companies, alongside the imposition of the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act (AFSPA) in select areas, has resulted in a saturation of security forces in the state. Despite these measures, the absence of political initiatives and confidence-building measures has allowed the crisis to deepen.

The Roots of the Conflict

The ethnic violence that erupted on May 3, 2023, between the Meiteis (majority in the Imphal Valley) and the Kuki-Zo tribals (residing in the surrounding hills) has led to significant loss of life and displacement.

  • Casualties and Displacement: 258 deaths and over 60,000 displaced.
  • Destruction of Religious Structures: 386 religious sites vandalized.
  • Recent Escalation: Violent encounters, such as the killing of 10 militants on November 11, have reignited tensions. Subsequent protests and political fallout highlight the state government's inability to restore normalcy.

Lessons Ignored: The Need for a Holistic Approach

Effective management of tribal unrest requires more than forceful suppression. While controlling violence is essential, it must be accompanied by:

  • Addressing grievances and reconciling differences.
  • Forming peace committees at multiple levels.
  • Taking political initiatives to inspire public confidence.
    The "Winning Hearts and Minds" (WHAM) approach, proven effective in counter-insurgency, has been underutilized.

Recommendations for Immediate Action

The situation demands decisive and multi-faceted interventions:

  1. Prime Ministerial Visit: The Prime Minister should visit Manipur to signal commitment and initiate dialogue.
  2. Imposition of President’s Rule: A dynamic governor with counter-insurgency experience should be appointed to lead the state.
  3. Administrative Overhaul: Ineffective senior officers should be replaced with those willing to tackle the crisis fearlessly.
  4. Uncompromising Integrity: A clear message should be conveyed that the integrity of Manipur is non-negotiable.
  5. Targeted Actions Against Miscreants:
    • Crackdown on individuals inciting or engaging in violence.
    • Address attempts to communalize the conflict and vandalism of religious sites.
    • Tackle drug trafficking with zero tolerance.
  6. Disarmament Drive: A time-bound initiative to recover unlicensed and prohibited weapons, with violators facing strict penalties under the National Security Act.
  7. Formation of Peace Committees: Establish district and state-level peace committees with representation from all communities to foster dialogue and reconciliation.

Conclusion: A Chance to Rebuild

While the Centre has lost precious time, it can still recover lost ground. Drawing inspiration from Chanakya’s wisdom—“We should not fret over the past, nor should we be anxious about the future. Men of discernment deal only with the present moment”—the Government of India must act decisively. Restoring peace in Manipur will be a challenging journey, but with sustained effort, it is achievable

Israel-Gaza Conflict: Developments in 2024 and the Road Ahead

 The Origins of the Current Conflict

The Israel-Gaza conflict escalated dramatically in October 2023 when Hamas militants launched a large-scale attack on southern Israel. The incursion resulted in over 1,200 Israeli deaths and 253 hostages being taken. Israel’s response was swift and severe, initiating an intense military campaign against Gaza that persisted throughout 2024.

Humanitarian Catastrophe in Gaza

The toll on Gaza has been devastating. Gaza health authorities report over 45,000 Palestinian fatalities, with nearly the entire population of 2.3 million displaced. Much of the territory has been reduced to rubble, creating a humanitarian crisis of unprecedented proportions.

International human rights organizations have condemned Israel’s actions. Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch have accused Israel of committing acts of genocide, including obstructing access to clean water in Gaza. The Israeli government has denied these allegations, asserting that it has facilitated water and humanitarian aid deliveries despite Hamas's continued attacks.

Hostage Crisis and Military Stalemate

Efforts to secure the release of more than 100 remaining hostages held by Hamas have largely failed. The hostages’ locations and health conditions remain unknown. According to the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), these attempts have been hindered by the complexities of the ongoing conflict.

Calls for a Ceasefire and International Mediation

US and Arab negotiators have been tirelessly working to broker a ceasefire. Talks held in Egypt and Qatar have made progress in narrowing differences, but significant sticking points remain unresolved. Despite these efforts, the conflict continues, now entering its 14th month.

Legal and Political Implications

In November 2024, the International Criminal Court (ICC) issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his former defense chief, accusing them of war crimes and crimes against humanity. While these developments have intensified global scrutiny, they have done little to alter the trajectory of the conflict.

Prospects for 2025: Will the War End?

There is cautious optimism that the war could end in 2025. Former US President Donald Trump, who is set to assume office again in January, has reportedly pressured Netanyahu to end the fighting before his inauguration. Trump’s directive, conveyed during a meeting at Mar-a-Lago, underscores the potential influence of international diplomacy on the conflict’s resolution.

The Future of Gaza

Post-war scenarios for Gaza remain uncertain. Netanyahu has stated that Israel will retain control of Gaza for the foreseeable future, with plans to establish a military buffer zone to prevent Hamas’s resurgence. The Israeli government has ruled out any administrative role for the Palestinian Authority in Gaza, further complicating prospects for peace.

Challenges of Reconstruction and Governance

Josef Federman, AP’s news director for the region, highlighted the immense challenges of rebuilding Gaza. With repeated cycles of destruction, securing investment for reconstruction will require significant changes in governance and international diplomacy.

Federman emphasized the need for a trusted authority to govern Gaza post-conflict, warning that any attempt to exclude Hamas entirely could undermine stability. The region’s future hinges on effective diplomacy and a willingness to address longstanding grievances.

Conclusion

As 2024 ends, the Israel-Gaza conflict remains a symbol of deep-seated animosities and geopolitical complexities. While there is hope for resolution in 2025, the path to lasting peace will require significant diplomatic breakthroughs and a commitment to addressing the root causes of the conflict.

Current Status and Projections for 2025-The Russia-Ukraine Conflict: A Protracted Struggle

 The Russia-Ukraine war, which began in February 2022, remained a dominant focus of global headlines in 2024. Over the course of the year, Russia made incremental gains in eastern Ukraine. By November, marking 1,000 days of the conflict, Russian forces had seized an additional 30 square kilometers of Ukrainian territory.

However, these advances have been slow and costly. The UK Ministry of Defence estimates Russia’s military casualties at 70,000 soldiers killed, with an additional 500,000 either killed or injured. Despite the losses, Russia continues to press forward.

Ukraine’s Counter-Offensive and the Nuclear Threat

In response, Ukraine launched counter-offensives into Russian territory. Notably, Kyiv claimed its forces encountered North Korean soldiers in Russia’s Kursk region—a claim that NATO has supported with evidence, though both Moscow and Pyongyang have denied it.

The conflict took a potentially dangerous turn when the United States authorized Ukraine to use long-range Army Tactical Missile Systems (ATACMS) against Russian targets. While experts argue that these missiles are not a strategic game-changer, Russia’s response was alarming. President Vladimir Putin lowered Russia’s nuclear threshold, warning NATO against further escalation.

Russia’s Ambitions for 2025

Looking ahead, Russia has set ambitious goals for 2025. According to Defense Minister Andrei Belousov, Moscow aims to fully capture Donetsk, Luhansk, Kherson, and Zaporizhzhia, territories central to its “special limited operation.” Experts believe Russia could achieve some of these objectives, particularly given the current challenges faced by Ukraine.

Ukraine’s Challenges: Internal and External Pressures

Ukraine’s situation appears increasingly dire. Former Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba warned that without significant changes, Ukraine risks losing the war. AP correspondent Samya Kullab described the conflict as a slow and devastating drain on Ukraine’s resources and morale.

Compounding Ukraine’s difficulties is the impending shift in U.S. leadership. With Donald Trump set to take office in January 2025, there is widespread concern about a potential reduction in American support for Kyiv. Trump, known for his transactional approach, may pressure Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to negotiate with Russia by threatening to cut military aid.

Prospects for Peace Talks

President Putin has expressed a willingness to negotiate with Trump and Ukraine’s legitimate authorities, though he has set strict conditions. In the past, Putin demanded that Ukraine withdraw from key regions, abandon its NATO aspirations, and formally recognize Crimea as Russian territory.

For any agreement to be binding, Putin insists it must involve Ukraine’s parliament and a legitimate leader. Zelenskyy, whose term has been extended due to martial law, would need re-election to satisfy Russia’s legal requirements for a deal.

European Support and the Path Forward

Despite America’s wavering stance, Europe remains steadfast in its support for Ukraine. In December, European foreign ministers pledged continued assistance. Kaja Kallas, the EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs, emphasized the need for Ukraine to shift the balance in its favor, stating that Putin “will not stop unless he’s stopped.”

The EU has maintained sanctions against Russian entities, but analysts argue that Europe must take a more active role. As The Guardian noted, Europe must step up to fill the potential void left by a retreating United States.

Strategic Options for Ukraine in 2025

Ukraine’s best hope may lie in buying time. Experts suggest Zelenskyy will need to balance negotiations with Russia while ensuring Ukraine’s frontlines remain intact. Simultaneously, Europe must demonstrate greater resolve and solidarity with its NATO allies.

In conclusion, while 2024 has been a year of attrition, the direction of the Russia-Ukraine conflict in 2025 will depend heavily on international dynamics, particularly the roles of the United States and Europe. As one commentator aptly put it, “In 2025, Europe will need to prove that it can walk the walk.”

Monday, 30 December 2024

Investing in Volatile Markets In 2025

 


बाळाजी शिक्षण प्रसारक मेळावा 29 डिसेंबर ब्रिग हेमंत महाजन पालक, शिक्षक ...

बाळाजी शिक्षण प्रसारक मंडळचा वार्षिक मेळावा 29 डिसेंबर 2024 25 ला ब्रिगेडियर हेमंत महाजन यांनी पालक, शिक्षक आणि विद्यार्थ्यांकरता केलेले मार्गदर्शन

China's Super Dam on the Brahmaputra: A Threat to India,BanglaDesh

 A Himalayan Power Play

China's construction of a massive dam on the Yarlung Tsangpo River (the Brahmaputra in India) raises serious concerns for downstream nations like India and Bangladesh. This project, part of China's 14th Five-Year Plan, has the potential to disrupt water flow, exacerbate flood risks, and serve as a strategic tool for Beijing during times of conflict. The dam's scale, exceeding even the Three Gorges Dam, makes its implications particularly significant.

The Yarlung Tsangpo: A River of Extremes

Originating in the glaciers of western Tibet at an altitude of 5,000 meters, the Yarlung Tsangpo is the world's highest river. Its dramatic course through the Himalayas includes the Yarlung Tsangpo Grand Canyon, a gorge more than twice the depth of the Grand Canyon in the United States. This unique geography makes it an attractive site for hydroelectric power generation.

A Dam of Unprecedented Scale

The proposed dam's construction cost is estimated at $137 billion, surpassing the $34.83 billion spent on the Three Gorges Dam. With a projected annual electricity generation capacity of 300 billion kilowatt-hours, it will dwarf the Three Gorges Dam's 88.2 billion kWh output. This massive project aligns with China's goals for carbon neutrality by 2060 and aims to boost related industries and employment in Tibet.

China's History of Dam Construction and its Environmental Impact

China has a long history of large-scale dam construction, with over 22,000 dams exceeding 15 meters in height built since 1950. While projects like the Three Gorges Dam offer benefits like clean energy, flood control, and improved navigation, they also raise serious ecological and social concerns. These include biodiversity loss, displacement of millions of people, increased risk of landslides and sedimentation, and destruction of downstream habitats.

The Super Dam Project: Engineering and Environmental Challenges

The new dam project, under development for over a decade, faces significant engineering challenges due to its location on a seismically active tectonic plate boundary. While Chinese authorities assert the project's safety, concerns remain about the potential for earthquakes, landslides, and ecological damage. The scale of potential displacement, though unknown, draws parallels with the Three Gorges Dam, which displaced 1.3 million people.

India's Concerns: Water Security and Strategic Implications

The Yarlung Tsangpo is crucial for the water security of millions in India, Bangladesh, and Bhutan. India's primary concerns regarding the dam are:

  • Water Flow Reduction: The dam could significantly reduce downstream water flow, especially during the dry season, potentially impacting agriculture and livelihoods.
  • Weaponization of Water: The dam gives China the ability to control water flow, potentially using it as a strategic weapon by releasing large volumes of water during times of conflict or during India's monsoon season, exacerbating floods.
  • Ecological and Environmental Risks: The dam's location in an earthquake-prone zone poses risks of dam failure, flash floods, and other ecological disasters.
  • Hydropeaking Impacts: Fluctuations in water release for peak electricity demand (hydropeaking) can negatively impact downstream river ecosystems.

The Lack of a Water Treaty and China's Stance

The absence of a bilateral water treaty between India and China exacerbates these concerns. China's reluctance to engage in meaningful discussions and its disregard for international conventions on equitable water use further complicate the situation. There are also concerns about China's plans to divert water to its parched northeast.

Past Warnings and China's Defense

In 2016, an Assamese NGO warned of China's plans for numerous dams and water diversion projects, predicting significant reductions in water flow to India. While China defends the project, stating it will not negatively affect downstream nations and that safety concerns have been addressed, skepticism remains.

The Need for Action: Transparency and International Cooperation

India and China have an agreement for data sharing on the Yarlung Tsangpo, but China has withheld this data in the past during periods of tension. India needs to take proactive steps to protect its interests, including pursuing bilateral negotiations and seeking international cooperation to ensure transparency and accountability in China's dam projects. The lack of transparency in China’s planning and operation of dams is a major concern. The Brahmaputra's massive hydroelectric potential is a powerful incentive for energy-hungry China.

Sunday, 29 December 2024

Pakistan's Airstrikes in Afghanistan: A Case of Irony and Escalation

 Cross-Border Terrorism Comes Full Circle

Pakistan, long accused of sponsoring cross-border terrorism, now finds itself grappling with its own terror-related challenges. This ironic turn of events was underscored by recent airstrikes in eastern Afghanistan that killed around 50 people, including women and children. These strikes came just days after Pakistani security forces eliminated 11 suspected terrorists in the volatile Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province.

Relations between Islamabad and Kabul have deteriorated sharply, driven by the rise in operations by the banned Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) against Pakistani military and police forces. Pakistan has repeatedly accused the Afghan Taliban of providing safe havens to TTP militants. However, the Afghan government remains in denial, exacerbating tensions between the two neighbors.

Diplomatic Duplicity and Regional Risks

The airstrikes highlight Pakistan’s duplicity. They occurred mere hours after Islamabad’s special representative for Afghanistan visited Kabul to discuss improving bilateral ties. This contradictory approach suggests Pakistan is only paying lip service to diplomacy while resorting to aggressive military actions. Such tactics could have dangerous consequences for the region, especially with the Afghan government warning that it will not leave this "cowardly act unanswered."

Domestic Politics and Strategic Motivations

The Shehbaz Sharif-led government appears unwilling to show weakness, particularly amid ongoing talks with jailed ex-Prime Minister Imran Khan’s Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party. The recent crackdown on PTI supporters has further alienated the public from the ruling coalition. The airstrikes, reminiscent of India’s Balakot operation, may be a calculated move by Pakistan’s establishment to rebuild its tarnished image.

Adding to the tension is Pakistan’s discontent over the growing rapport between the Taliban and India. This development has irked Islamabad, which sees it as a strategic loss in its backyard. However, Pakistan’s actions may provoke a fierce retaliation not only from the Afghan Taliban but also from the TTP, further destabilizing the region.

Implications for India

For India, a long-standing victim of terrorism, these developments demand close monitoring. Pakistan’s internal strife and its increasingly strained relations with Afghanistan could have spillover effects, impacting regional security dynamics. Vigilance and preparedness remain crucial as the situation evolves.

Pakistan’s airstrikes in Afghanistan are a stark reminder of the perils of its double-edged policies. As it faces backlash from both domestic and external fronts, Islamabad must tread carefully to avoid plunging the region into further chaos

Interlinking Rivers: The Genesis of River-Linking Projects

 Mega river-interlinking projects were first envisioned in the 1980s as a solution to growing water stress across India. However, it has taken four decades for the first such initiative — the Ken-Betwa link — to move from concept to execution. This delay underscores the complexities and challenges associated with such ambitious and expensive undertakings. The Prime Minister’s remarks during the foundation stone-laying ceremony emphasized the critical importance of water security in the 21st century, highlighting the government’s determination to pursue river-linking as a strategy.

The intent behind these projects is clear: to transfer water from surplus river basins to deficit ones via reservoirs and canals, transforming water-scarce regions into productive areas. While proponents assert that environmental risks have been adequately assessed, significant concerns persist about the long-term impacts of altering natural water systems on such a massive scale.

Scope and Justification of the Projects

The National Water Development Agency has proposed 30 river-linking projects, spanning both Himalayan and peninsular regions, with an estimated budget of $168 billion. The expected benefits include greater equity in water distribution, enhanced flood control, drought mitigation, and increased hydropower generation capacity. These compelling objectives provide a strong rationale for the projects.

However, caution is warranted. Research suggests that such hydro-engineering projects could disrupt monsoon cycles and destabilize delicate hydro-meteorological systems. Moreover, the ecological destruction associated with these initiatives is a serious concern.

The Need for a Pragmatic Approach

To navigate these challenges, a pragmatic approach is essential. Those involved in executing these projects must remain open to revisiting and refining their plans based on informed feedback. The Ken-Betwa project serves as a test case for leveraging science to balance the benefits and risks, offering solutions to complex environmental patterns while minimizing harm.

Addressing the Missing Link in Water Conservation

A collective effort to conserve water remains an overlooked aspect of public policy. Alongside prioritizing large-scale river-linking projects, the government must invest in research to develop affordable and efficient technologies. These should include advancements in irrigation practices, wastewater recycling, and the sanitation of polluted water sources.

By combining innovative water conservation methods with a cautious, science-driven approach to river interlinking, India can move closer to addressing its water security challenges while safeguarding its ecological balance.

Saturday, 28 December 2024

PROTECTING INDIAN NATIONAL INTERESTS IN 2024

 

2024: A Year of Diplomatic Triumphs and Challenges for India

In a year marked by global turmoil and uncertainty, India has pursued a confident and assertive foreign policy, reaching out to all corners of the world. While engaging the United States, managing a complex relationship with China, cultivating Europe, and reassuring Russia, India has continued to safeguard and promote its security and economic interests.


Global Context: A Tumultuous Year

The year 2024 was fraught with unexpected developments. Prolonged wars, global elections across 60 nations with surprising outcomes, and heightened anti-incumbency waves underscored the era's unpredictability. This uncertainty has left the global economic, strategic, and security architecture in flux, making India’s diplomatic achievements even more noteworthy.


Key Milestones in Indian Diplomacy

Continuity in Leadership

The re-election of the NDA government under Prime Minister Narendra Modi provided much-needed continuity. The reappointment of S. Jaishankar as External Affairs Minister reassured global partners of India's commitment to multi-alignment, “Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam,” and “Vishvabandhu” policies.

Strengthening US and Quad Relations

Prime Minister Modi’s bilateral visit to Washington, D.C., in September was a highlight, including the fourth in-person Quad summit in Wilmington, Delaware. While India postponed its turn to host the Quad Summit to 2025 due to President Biden’s election commitments, the flexibility demonstrated the Quad’s enduring commitment to a free and secure Indo-Pacific.

India also welcomed Donald Trump’s decisive re-election as U.S. President. Modi was quick to congratulate Trump, highlighting the strong rapport between the two leaders. This transition signals a positive trajectory for India-US relations, despite potential challenges in trade and tariffs.


Deepening Ties with Russia

Prime Minister Modi’s stand-alone visit to Russia in July and participation in the BRICS Summit in Kazan in October underscored India’s strategic autonomy. India’s significant purchase of discounted Russian oil and its role as a potential messenger in the Russia-Ukraine conflict highlighted its balanced approach. At the BRICS Summit, India reinforced its preference for trading in national currencies over a common BRICS currency.


Engaging China: Progress Amid Distrust

In a notable development, India and China agreed to revert to pre-2020 patrolling arrangements in Depsang and Demchok. Modi and Xi Jinping held a structured meeting at the BRICS Summit, marking a step toward normalizing relations. However, deep mistrust over China’s intentions persists.


Championing the Global South

India’s third Voice of the Global South (VOGS) Summit in August reinforced its leadership role. With participation from over 123 countries, including 21 heads of state, the summit advanced the theme “An Empowered Global South for a Sustainable Future,” emphasizing India’s commitment to inclusivity and shared prosperity.


Regional Diplomacy: Neighbourhood First

Strengthening Ties with Sri Lanka and Bhutan

Sri Lankan President Anura Kumar Dissanayake’s visit in December reaffirmed the island nation’s commitment to India’s security. India also deepened ties with Bhutan through high-level visits.

Recalibrating Relations with the Maldives

Despite initial tensions with Maldives’ President Mohamed Muizzu, strategic patience and diplomacy restored stability. Muizzu acknowledged India as a valued partner, highlighting India’s crucial role in Maldives’ economic recovery.


Engagement with Distant Shores

Prime Minister Modi’s visits to Guyana, Austria, Poland, and the Caribbean, along with the Republic Day visit of French President Emmanuel Macron, strengthened India’s ties with Europe and beyond. These engagements reflected India’s growing global footprint.


Diplomatic Hiccups

Canada’s Allegations

Relations with Canada hit an all-time low after Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s unsubstantiated allegations about India’s involvement in the killing of Hardeep Nijjar. India’s strong response underscored its unwillingness to tolerate support for extremism and separatism under the guise of vote-bank politics.

Crisis in Bangladesh

The coup in Bangladesh and subsequent violence against minorities posed a significant challenge. India raised concerns over the safety of Hindus and other minorities while maintaining a calibrated approach to stabilize ties.


India’s Assertive Diplomacy

Despite global uncertainties stemming from conflicts, climate change, and governance failures, India’s foreign policy in 2024 demonstrated resilience and strategic clarity. Through multi-alignment and proactive engagement, India solidified its role as a global leader and a trusted partner to nations across the world.

India’s pursuit of strategic autonomy and its role as Vishvabandhu reaffirmed its commitment to building a more inclusive and sustainable global order.