The recent terrorist attack in Pahalgam has opened a historic opportunity to address the jihadi ideology pervasive in Pakistan. However, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi’s comments during a call with his Pakistani counterpart, Ishaq Dar, are not only unsurprising but also deeply troubling. For decades, China has exhibited animosity towards India, making such responses expected.
According to the Chinese state media outlet Xinhua, Wang Yi emphasized that "combating terrorism is a shared responsibility," reaffirming China's support for Pakistan's counterterrorism efforts. He described China as an "ironclad friend" of Pakistan, stating that it understands Pakistan’s security concerns and supports its sovereignty. Wang also called for a "swift and fair investigation" into the attacks, advocating for restraint and cooperation between India and Pakistan.
The Chameleon-like Nature of Chinese Diplomacy
A day after condemning the Pahalgam attacks, China quickly shifted its stance. This pattern reflects a longstanding strategy to protect Pakistan from India's justified response. While Chinese officials expressed condemnation initially, Wang Yi's remarks reveal a familiar double standard, showing sympathy for Pakistan while downplaying India's legitimate concerns.
It is essential to clarify that the attack that killed over two dozen innocent civilians occurred in Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir—not in Pakistan. Therefore, any "consistent support" for Pakistan's counterterrorism efforts is misplaced; instead, Wang should advocate for India's fight against terrorism.
China’s Human Rights Record
Wang Yi, who lacks the authority to call for an investigation into the Pahalgam attacks, should reflect on China's own human rights violations. The Chinese government has oppressed millions in Xinjiang and Tibet, making it hypocritical for them to lecture others on counterterrorism. Instead of offering unsolicited advice, China should caution Pakistan against its ongoing cross-border terrorism, which has dire consequences.
The Pahalgam attack is a heinous act condemned globally, and India is prepared to respond decisively. Both Pakistan and China must recognize that India has the capability to identify and punish those responsible for such acts, and further actions are forthcoming.
Historical Context of Chinese Hostility
China's antagonism towards India is not new. From the forcible occupation of Indian territories in the mid-20th century to the 1962 war and recent incursions, China has consistently sought to undermine India. The violent clash in Galwan in June 2020, which resulted in the deaths of 20 Indian soldiers, exemplifies China’s treachery.
China's unwavering support for Pakistan indicates its complicity in fostering terrorism. Over the past decade, China has repeatedly blocked India’s attempts to designate Masood Azhar as a global terrorist at the United Nations Security Council (UNSC). Azhar, founder of Jaish-e-Mohammad, has orchestrated numerous attacks in India, including the February 2019 Pulwama attack that killed 40 Indian security personnel.
China’s Role in the UNSC
Beijing first blocked India's proposal to designate Azhar as a terrorist in 2009, following the 26/11 Mumbai attacks. Since then, China has consistently used its veto power to obstruct similar resolutions, further demonstrating its support for terrorism. Most recently, China tampered with a UNSC draft condemning the Pahalgam attacks, changing the wording to undermine India's position.
A Call for Chinese Restraint
China must recognize that India has never interfered in its internal affairs and has consistently condemned terrorist attacks against China. Instead of meddling in India’s sovereignty, Beijing should focus on addressing its own issues and cease supporting Pakistan-sponsored terrorism.
Moreover, China should remember the goodwill displayed by India in recent months to renew bilateral relations. The economic repercussions of strained ties with India should serve as a reminder of the benefits of cooperation. As a responsible global power, China should prioritize the fight against terrorism rather than supporting rogue states.
No comments:
Post a Comment