UPDATE POST KASHMIR TERROR ATTACK-Pakistan's Economic Strain and Geopolitical Challenges: A Multifaceted Crisis

 

Recent events have plunged Pakistan into a complex web of economic hardship, internal strife, and international isolation. The nation grapples with the repercussions of regional tensions, impacting its economy, public sentiment, and global standing.  

Economic Impact: A Deepening Crisis

Pakistan's economy is facing a severe downturn, exacerbated by a confluence of factors. The ongoing trade war has significantly disrupted its export-oriented industries, leading to a decline in revenue and increased unemployment. Furthermore, the prolonged closure of its airspace has imposed substantial financial burdens, as airlines are forced to reroute flights, incurring additional fuel and operational costs. This has resulted in a sharp decline in aircraft landings at Pakistani airports, hindering tourism and business travel.  

The impact extends to maritime trade, with a drastic reduction in merchant navy ship visits to Pakistani ports. This decline in shipping activity disrupts supply chains, affecting imports and exports, and further straining the economy. The substantial war preparedness costs are also taking a heavy toll on ordinary Pakistanis, diverting resources from essential public services and exacerbating existing financial vulnerabilities.

Public Sentiment and Internal Challenges: A Nation Divided

Amidst these economic woes, a significant portion of the Pakistani populace expresses a strong opposition to war. The public is weary of conflict and its devastating consequences, prioritizing economic stability and peace. However, the nation confronts severe internal challenges, notably the uprisings in Balochistan and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. These regional conflicts, fueled by grievances and separatist movements, divert military resources and destabilize the country.  

Increased Security and Kashmir Tourism: A Region Under Strain

The heightened security measures, particularly those surrounding figures like Hafiz Saeed, reflect the volatile security landscape. However, they also contribute to a decline in Kashmir tourism. The region's appeal as a tourist destination has diminished due to security concerns, impacting the local economy and livelihoods.  

External Support: Limited Options and Strategic Entanglements

Pakistan's international support network appears limited. Analysis of Pakistani media suggests a growing awareness of this isolation. While China and Turkey are seen as potential allies, their support may be constrained by their own strategic interests. Notably, China's economic entanglement with Pakistan presents a complex scenario. While it provides some financial assistance, it also creates a dependency that could benefit India by limiting Pakistan’s strategic options.

Pahalgam Attack and International Reactions: A Diplomatic Fallout

The Pakistani media's analysis of the Pahalgam attack reveals a struggle to justify the action's strategic gains, especially given the significant international backlash. The disruption of a Pakistani NRI seminar at Harvard University underscores the growing international scrutiny. Furthermore, a viral video exposing a Khalistani leader seeking ISI support has further tarnished Pakistan's image, fueling accusations of state-sponsored terrorism.

India's Strategic Moves and Public Concerns: A Calculated Response

India's strategic moves, such as prioritizing a bilateral trade agreement with the USA, signal a focus on strengthening international partnerships. India's public announcement of its long-range weapon capabilities serves as a strategic deterrent, signaling its resolve. However, it also raises public concerns and questions about the potential for escalation. The delay in immediate retaliation reflects a calculated approach, weighing the cost of war against the need for a measured response.  

Canadian Election and Khalistan Issue: A Global Dimension

The Liberal victory in Canada and the setback for Jagmeet Singh's party have implications for the Khalistan movement. Canada has a significant Sikh population and some elements of that population have supported the Khalistan movement. The Canadian election results may affect the political dynamics surrounding this issue.  

In conclusion, Pakistan faces a multifaceted crisis encompassing economic hardship, internal conflicts, and international isolation. The nation's ability to navigate these challenges will determine its future stability and regional influence.

Pakistan’s plan to challenge India’s suspension of Indus Waters Treaty won’t work

 Heightened Tensions and Treaty Suspension

In the aftermath of the devastating terror attack in Pahalgam, which resulted in the loss of 26 lives, tensions between India and Pakistan have escalated significantly. Responding to the attack, India has taken a firm stance by suspending the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) of 1960 with Pakistan. New Delhi has declared that this suspension will remain in effect until Pakistan credibly and irreversibly ceases its support for cross-border terrorism.  

Pakistan's Outrage and Threat of Retaliation

India's decision to suspend the crucial water treaty has provoked strong condemnation from Islamabad. Pakistan's Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif's office issued a statement denouncing the move as an "act of war." The statement asserted that any attempt to obstruct or divert Pakistan's water rights under the IWT would be met with a forceful response across all dimensions of national power.  

Islamabad Considers International Legal Action

Despite its strong rhetoric, Pakistan is now exploring international legal avenues to challenge India's suspension of the IWT. Pakistan's Minister of State for Law and Justice, Aqeel Malik, indicated that Islamabad is considering at least three legal options, including approaching the World Bank (the treaty's facilitator), the Permanent Court of Arbitration, or the International Court of Justice (ICJ). Pakistan intends to argue that India's action constitutes a violation of the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. Raising the issue at the United Nations Security Council is another option under consideration. Malik emphasized that all appropriate forums are being explored.  

The Indus Waters Treaty: A Vital Agreement

The Indus Waters Treaty, signed in 1960 after nine years of negotiations, governs the distribution of water from the Indus River and its tributaries between India and Pakistan. Under the treaty, India has unrestricted use of the waters of the eastern rivers – the Ravi, Sutlej, and Beas. Pakistan controls the western rivers – the Indus, Chenab, and Jhelum. Remarkably, this treaty has endured through three wars fought between the two nations. However, India's recent suspension reflects a shift in its stance, signaling a breaking point.  

Pakistan's Dependence on Indus Waters

The suspension of the IWT places Pakistan in a precarious position. Its agricultural sector, which heavily relies on the Indus waters, contributes significantly to the nation's economy, accounting for 24% of its GDP and employing 37.4% of the population in 2024. The majority of Pakistan's population is directly or indirectly dependent on agriculture. Pakistani farmers have voiced concerns about potential water shortages or even intentional flooding by India, highlighting their vulnerability.  

India's Justification for Suspension

Despite Pakistan's legal intentions, Indian water resources officials maintain that New Delhi has a strong legal basis to defend its decision. Kushvinder Vohra, a retired head of India's Central Water Commission, believes Pakistan's legal options are limited and that India has solid grounds for its action.  

Limitations of the International Court of Justice

Pakistan's plan to approach the International Court of Justice faces a significant hurdle. India has explicitly excluded disputes with Commonwealth nations from the ICJ's jurisdiction. Since Pakistan is a Commonwealth member, it cannot bring a case against India in this court. Furthermore, India's reservations also exclude ICJ jurisdiction over disputes related to acts taken in self-defense or for national security, which India is likely to argue in this situation.

The World Bank's Limited Role

Seeking intervention from the World Bank is also unlikely to yield the results Pakistan desires. While the World Bank played a role in facilitating the IWT and can appoint neutral experts and arbitrators, it lacks the authority to enforce the treaty's provisions or mandate its continuation.  

Legal Experts Highlight Pakistan's Weak Position

Echoing this sentiment, former Pakistani federal law minister Ahmer Bilal Soofi had previously stated in 2016 that Pakistan would have limited recourse if India chose to disregard the treaty. He explained that the treaty's dispute resolution mechanisms are designed for disagreements within the treaty's framework, not for cases where a party seeks to revive a suspended treaty. Soofi also pointed out the absence of any provision within the IWT addressing its duration or suspension, leaving Pakistan without a clear legal path to compel India to resume the treaty. He concluded that India's ICJ reservation further eliminates any peaceful mechanism for Pakistan to enforce the treaty.

पहलगाम दहशतवादी हल्ला _भारतीय सैन्याची पाकिस्तान वरती वेगवेगळ्या दिशेने...

The Pakistan Army, an institution historically central to the nation's identity and security apparatus, is reportedly facing a significant internal challenge. ¹ Amidst escalating tensions on the border with India, a wave of dissatisfaction appears to be brewing within its ranks. Recent reports suggest a considerable number of resignations among both officers and soldiers, allegedly triggered by factors such as frequently changing military orders, mounting mental fatigue, and increasing familial pressures, particularly in the aftermath of the Pahalgam attack. ² This purported mass departure of personnel, with estimates suggesting as many as 100 commanders and 500 soldiers resigning in a single day, could potentially place Pakistan in a precarious situation, especially given the heightened geopolitical climate.   

1. Unveiling the Pakistan Army: A Comprehensive Look at its Role and History

russellbedford.com

2. Pakistan Army in Crisis Amid Resignations and Fears of Indian Retaliation | News9

www.youtube.com

The Commander's Concern: Lieutenant General Bukhari's SOS

The gravity of the situation is seemingly underscored by a reported communication from Lieutenant General Umar Ahmed Bukhari, the commander of the 11th Corps. This crucial corps holds the responsibility for the security of the volatile Indo-Pak border along the Line of Control (LoC). According to the initial report, Lieutenant General Bukhari has conveyed his profound concerns regarding this growing trend of soldiers and commanders seeking premature departure from service directly to the Army Headquarters. This internal communication highlights the potential operational implications of such widespread discontent and the urgency with which the issue is being viewed by senior military leadership on the ground.

Unpacking the Sources of Dissatisfaction Among the Ranks

Several interconnected factors appear to be contributing to the rising tide of dissatisfaction within the Pakistan Army. The heightened state of alert and frequent skirmishes along the border with India are undoubtedly placing immense pressure on the rank and file. Soldiers deployed in these challenging conditions often face prolonged periods of stress, exposure to danger, and separation from their families. This sustained operational tempo can lead to significant mental fatigue and a decline in morale.

Furthermore, the initial report points towards alleged inconsistencies and a lack of clarity in the directives emanating from military commanders. Frequently changing orders and perceived arbitrariness in task assignments can breed confusion, uncertainty, and a sense of disorganization among the soldiers. This lack of clear and consistent leadership can erode trust and contribute to feelings of frustration and disillusionment.

The allegations of favouritism in transfer and posting decisions further exacerbate the sense of unfairness and inequity within the army. When promotions and assignments are perceived to be based on personal connections rather than merit or operational needs, it can lead to resentment and a feeling of being undervalued among the soldiers. This can significantly impact morale and foster an environment conducive to dissatisfaction and the desire to leave the service.

The Scale of the Exodus: Resignations within the 11th Corps

The reported scale of the resignations within the 11th Corps, led by Lieutenant General Umar Ahmed Bukhari since 2024, paints a concerning picture. The claim that an internal investigation conducted on April 26, 2025, revealed the resignation of approximately 100 military officers and over 500 lower-ranking soldiers underscores the potential magnitude of this internal crisis. If these figures are accurate, the 11th Corps, responsible for a critical section of the border, may be facing significant manpower shortages, potentially impacting its operational effectiveness and its ability to maintain security along the LoC.

Operational Implications: A Thinning Frontline

The consequences of these resignations are reportedly becoming visible on the ground. The initial report suggests a noticeable decrease in the number of soldiers within key frontline units, including infantry regiments, mountain battalions in the northern regions, and artillery regiments. These units are crucial for maintaining defensive positions and responding to any potential cross-border incursions. A depletion of personnel in these formations could weaken Pakistan's defensive capabilities along the border, especially at a time of heightened tensions with India. This reduction in frontline strength could also place additional pressure on the remaining soldiers, potentially leading to further fatigue and a cycle of attrition.

The Army's Response: Rejection of Resignations and Potential Ramifications

In response to Lieutenant General Bukhari's communication, the Pakistan Army Headquarters has reportedly adopted a firm stance, stating that the resignations will not be accepted during this period of crisis. Citing a violation of military rules, the headquarters has reportedly warned the resigning commanders and soldiers of potential disciplinary action. This কঠোর response suggests the army's concern over the implications of these mass resignations on its operational readiness and its desire to maintain discipline and cohesion within its ranks.

However, simply refusing to accept resignations may not address the underlying causes of the dissatisfaction. While it might prevent an immediate mass exodus, it could potentially lead to further resentment and a decline in morale among those who feel compelled to leave but are being forced to stay. The long-term consequences of ignoring the root causes of this discontent could be detrimental to the overall health and effectiveness of the Pakistan Army

Growing Discontent within the Pakistan Army: An Analysis of Resignations Following the Pahalgam Incident

 The Pakistan Army, an institution historically central to the nation's identity and security apparatus, is reportedly facing a significant internal challenge. ¹ Amidst escalating tensions on the border with India, a wave of dissatisfaction appears to be brewing within its ranks. Recent reports suggest a considerable number of resignations among both officers and soldiers, allegedly triggered by factors such as frequently changing military orders, mounting mental fatigue, and increasing familial pressures, particularly in the aftermath of the Pahalgam attack. ² This purported mass departure of personnel, with estimates suggesting as many as 100 commanders and 500 soldiers resigning in a single day, could potentially place Pakistan in a precarious situation, especially given the heightened geopolitical climate.   

1. Unveiling the Pakistan Army: A Comprehensive Look at its Role and History

russellbedford.com

2. Pakistan Army in Crisis Amid Resignations and Fears of Indian Retaliation | News9

www.youtube.com

The Commander's Concern: Lieutenant General Bukhari's SOS

The gravity of the situation is seemingly underscored by a reported communication from Lieutenant General Umar Ahmed Bukhari, the commander of the 11th Corps. This crucial corps holds the responsibility for the security of the volatile Indo-Pak border along the Line of Control (LoC). According to the initial report, Lieutenant General Bukhari has conveyed his profound concerns regarding this growing trend of soldiers and commanders seeking premature departure from service directly to the Army Headquarters. This internal communication highlights the potential operational implications of such widespread discontent and the urgency with which the issue is being viewed by senior military leadership on the ground.

Unpacking the Sources of Dissatisfaction Among the Ranks

Several interconnected factors appear to be contributing to the rising tide of dissatisfaction within the Pakistan Army. The heightened state of alert and frequent skirmishes along the border with India are undoubtedly placing immense pressure on the rank and file. Soldiers deployed in these challenging conditions often face prolonged periods of stress, exposure to danger, and separation from their families. This sustained operational tempo can lead to significant mental fatigue and a decline in morale.

Furthermore, the initial report points towards alleged inconsistencies and a lack of clarity in the directives emanating from military commanders. Frequently changing orders and perceived arbitrariness in task assignments can breed confusion, uncertainty, and a sense of disorganization among the soldiers. This lack of clear and consistent leadership can erode trust and contribute to feelings of frustration and disillusionment.

The allegations of favouritism in transfer and posting decisions further exacerbate the sense of unfairness and inequity within the army. When promotions and assignments are perceived to be based on personal connections rather than merit or operational needs, it can lead to resentment and a feeling of being undervalued among the soldiers. This can significantly impact morale and foster an environment conducive to dissatisfaction and the desire to leave the service.

The Scale of the Exodus: Resignations within the 11th Corps

The reported scale of the resignations within the 11th Corps, led by Lieutenant General Umar Ahmed Bukhari since 2024, paints a concerning picture. The claim that an internal investigation conducted on April 26, 2025, revealed the resignation of approximately 100 military officers and over 500 lower-ranking soldiers underscores the potential magnitude of this internal crisis. If these figures are accurate, the 11th Corps, responsible for a critical section of the border, may be facing significant manpower shortages, potentially impacting its operational effectiveness and its ability to maintain security along the LoC.

Operational Implications: A Thinning Frontline

The consequences of these resignations are reportedly becoming visible on the ground. The initial report suggests a noticeable decrease in the number of soldiers within key frontline units, including infantry regiments, mountain battalions in the northern regions, and artillery regiments. These units are crucial for maintaining defensive positions and responding to any potential cross-border incursions. A depletion of personnel in these formations could weaken Pakistan's defensive capabilities along the border, especially at a time of heightened tensions with India. This reduction in frontline strength could also place additional pressure on the remaining soldiers, potentially leading to further fatigue and a cycle of attrition.

The Army's Response: Rejection of Resignations and Potential Ramifications

In response to Lieutenant General Bukhari's communication, the Pakistan Army Headquarters has reportedly adopted a firm stance, stating that the resignations will not be accepted during this period of crisis. Citing a violation of military rules, the headquarters has reportedly warned the resigning commanders and soldiers of potential disciplinary action. This কঠোর response suggests the army's concern over the implications of these mass resignations on its operational readiness and its desire to maintain discipline and cohesion within its ranks.

However, simply refusing to accept resignations may not address the underlying causes of the dissatisfaction. While it might prevent an immediate mass exodus, it could potentially lead to further resentment and a decline in morale among those who feel compelled to leave but are being forced to stay. The long-term consequences of ignoring the root causes of this discontent could be detrimental to the overall health and effectiveness of the Pakistan Army

The Pakistan-China Axis: A Strategy to Retard India's Economic Progress, Why is China Helping Pakistan? China’s Diplomatic Shield for Pakistan,Moral and Material Support: Arms and Ammunition

 

Why is China Helping Pakistan?

The growing strategic nexus between China and Pakistan is one of the most critical geopolitical developments in South Asia. Far beyond friendship or ideological similarity, the China-Pakistan partnership is fundamentally based on mutual interests — especially their shared desire to counterbalance India's rise. China's sustained support to Pakistan — moral, material, diplomatic, and military — must be understood through the prism of great power rivalry and regional dynamics.

The Pakistan-China Axis: A Strategy to Retard India's Economic Progress

One of China's primary motivations in supporting Pakistan is to ensure that India's economic, political, and military rise is checked. By strengthening Pakistan economically and militarily, China seeks to keep India bogged down in South Asian rivalries, preventing it from focusing on larger global ambitions. Every major India-Pakistan confrontation serves Chinese interests by diverting India's attention, draining its resources, and maintaining strategic instability in the region.

China’s Diplomatic Shield for Pakistan

In international forums such as the United Nations Security Council, China has consistently shielded Pakistan from global censure. Notably, China has worked to water down resolutions that sought to hold Pakistan accountable for sponsoring terrorism. In several instances, China has advocated for "third-party investigations," subtly shifting focus away from Pakistan’s culpability. This diplomatic cover allows Pakistan to continue its activities without facing serious international consequences.

Moral and Material Support: Arms and Ammunition

China provides unwavering moral support to Pakistan, portraying it as a victim of regional instability rather than an instigator. More significantly, China has become one of Pakistan's largest suppliers of arms and ammunition. Modern fighter jets, tanks, submarines, and missile systems have all been provided or co-developed. This military assistance helps Pakistan bridge its capability gaps vis-à-vis India, but it also deepens Pakistan’s dependency on China for defense supplies, technology, and maintenance.

The Heavy Price Pakistan Must Pay

However, this support is not without heavy costs. Pakistan is increasingly mortgaging its sovereignty to China. Financial dependency is becoming acute, with Pakistan having to make unsustainable commitments to Chinese projects under unfavorable terms. The dream of economic prosperity through Chinese investments has turned into a nightmare of debt and strategic subservience.

The CPEC Corridor: A Failing Dream

The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), once hailed as a "game-changer," is facing serious setbacks. Approximately $15-16 billion worth of Chinese investments are stuck in Pakistan, including the much-touted Gwadar Port. Far from becoming a hub of regional trade, Gwadar remains underdeveloped, poorly connected, and plagued by insecurity.

Pakistan’s inability to complete projects on time, rampant corruption, political instability, and local resistance have all contributed to the CPEC’s underperformance. China expected rapid returns and secure passage for its goods to the Arabian Sea — but what it got instead was uncertainty and mounting losses.

Pakistan's Non-Payment and Security Failures

Pakistan is in no position to repay the massive loans extended by China. The Pakistani economy, already on life support, cannot service these debts without perpetual bailouts from the IMF and other lenders. Moreover, Pakistan has failed to secure the CPEC corridor against militant threats, despite deploying tens of thousands of troops. Attacks on Chinese engineers and workers have become frequent, leading to frustration in Beijing.

Historical Betrayal: Pakistan’s Surrender of Territory to China

The roots of the Pakistan-China alliance go back to 1963 when Pakistan ceded the Shaksgam Valley (part of the disputed Kashmir region) to China. This strategic giveaway symbolized Pakistan’s willingness to sacrifice territorial sovereignty in favor of forging an alliance against India. That decision still echoes today, as Pakistan continues to prioritize this relationship over its own long-term national interests.

More Worrying Signs: Pressure Along the Chinese Border

Beyond Pakistan, China is also applying direct pressure on India along the Line of Actual Control (LAC). The increased tensions in Ladakh and Arunachal Pradesh are designed to stretch Indian military resources across multiple fronts. In such a scenario, the Pakistan-China nexus becomes even more dangerous — a pincer movement that seeks to keep India constantly on edge, militarily engaged, and economically constrained

 

 

 

Biased Reporting by Western Media on the Hindu Massacre in Kashmir

 

Systematic Denial of Atrocities

Since the day of the tragic massacre of Hindus in Kashmir, many Western legacy media outlets—particularly American ones like CNN, Associated Press (AP), and The New York Times (NYT)—have engaged in systematic atrocity denial. Through subtle manipulations of language, they confuse, minimize, and ultimately trivialize the scale and magnitude of the tragedy, denying the reality of what transpired.

Linguistic Distortion to Obfuscate Reality

The manipulation occurs both textually and contextually, using linguistic strategies that alter the very nomenclature and interpretation of events. For example, by framing the attack as “indiscriminate spraying of bullets,” these outlets challenge the reality that Hindus were specifically targeted. This linguistic camouflage dilutes the fact that this was a religiously motivated, targeted cleansing, backed by an adversarial state across the border, and reduces it to an act of random bloodletting.

Shaping Public Cognition and Value Judgments

The ultimate aim is to shape how the public "sees" and "interprets" the massacre. Within Western academic and media discourse, not all identities are treated equally. Hindus are often denied the status of legitimate victims because, according to these frameworks, they are seen as "oppressors," not as an oppressed group. Therefore, the religious identity of the victims is deliberately obscured, presenting the massacre as random violence rather than targeted ethnic cleansing.

Victims Misrepresented as "Collaborators"

The narrative is further skewed to paint the Indian state as the oppressor and Islamist terrorists as "rebels," "militants," or "gunmen" airing their grievances. Victims are subtly portrayed not as innocent civilians but as "collaborators" deserving of their fate. This tactic of narrative inversion ensures the horror of the attack is systematically denied or justified.

Case Study: Associated Press’s Malicious Reporting

Consider the reportage by Aijaz Hussain, Sheikh Saaliq, and Rajesh Roy for AP:

“India blamed Pakistan on Wednesday for a militant attack that killed 26 people in Indian-held Kashmir, downgrading diplomatic ties and suspending a crucial water-sharing treaty that has withstood two wars between the nuclear-armed rivals… The spray of gunfire at tourists Tuesday…”

Notice the use of terms like “militant attack,” “spray of gunfire,” and “tourists.” By avoiding the word “terrorist,” the report downplays the crime's heinousness and subtly questions India's sovereignty by using the phrase “Indian-held Kashmir.” There is a deliberate erasure of the Hindu identity of the victims, painting the event as random violence.

Justifying Terror Through Twisted Narratives

AP’s report even quotes a terrorist group's statement suggesting that the victims were not “ordinary tourists” but affiliated with Indian security agencies. Such framing grotesquely justifies terrorism under the pretext of political struggle and is a disgraceful low in journalistic ethics.

Moreover, AP’s photo selection adds insult to injury—highlighting the grief of the lone Muslim victim’s family while sidelining the Hindu victims who were specifically targeted. This selection is not coincidental but fits neatly into the larger narrative of Hindu villainization and Muslim victimhood.

The New York Times: A Study in Gaslighting

The NYT’s reporting is similarly insidious. Even after public rebukes, such as by the US House Committee on Foreign Affairs, NYT continues to label terrorists as "militants" and minimizes the massacre of Hindus to mere hearsay:

“General Hooda said… witness accounts in Indian media suggested Hindus had been singled out…”

The NYT report refuses to acknowledge the targeted nature of the massacre, trivializes survivors’ experiences, and instead focuses on political implications, treating the tragedy as a backdrop for Indo-Pak rivalry rather than a humanitarian catastrophe.

Distorting Reality and Undermining India’s Sovereignty

Throughout their reporting, NYT emphasizes India’s supposed "rash" reaction to Pakistan and frames the tragedy in a manner that infantilizes the Indian government. Peace, development, and normalcy achieved in Kashmir post-Article 370 are dismissed as mere "illusions shattered."

Such framing seeks to deny India the right to respond forcefully to terrorism, invoking the specter of "nuclear escalation" to argue against any decisive action. This false equivalence between a terror-sponsoring state and a victim nation is both immoral and intellectually dishonest.

Selective Empathy and Heartless Storytelling

The NYT even dehumanizes survivors. As pointed out by Indu Viswanathan on X, the NYT describes a grieving young woman by her jacket color, ignoring the heartbreaking reality that she was a Hindu bride mourning her newlywed husband. Such tone-deaf descriptions betray a complete lack of empathy and a calculated attempt to obscure the true horror.

Conclusion: Identity Politics and Narrative Injustice

The selective terminologies, semantic trickery, and deliberate erasures by Western media are not random mistakes—they are deeply ideological choices. In the Western framework of identity politics, Hindus are forever relegated to the margins. Regardless of the magnitude of suffering—massacres, ethnic cleansing, or genocide—Hindus are denied true victimhood.

Their grief is minimized, their tragedies reframed, and their lived experiences twisted to fit a global narrative where only certain groups are allowed to claim moral high ground. In this distorted reality, even mourning becomes suspect if Hindus do it.

Thus, the Western media’s biased reportage on the Kashmir massacre represents not merely bad journalism but a deeper, more dangerous form of ideological warfare against truth and justice.

#पहलगाम हल्ल्यानंतर सडेतोड उत्तर ; भारताने उचलले कारवाईचे यशस्वी पाऊल #P...

भारत  सिंधू खोऱ्याचं पाणी अडवू शकतो का?

पहलगामच्या नृशंस कृत्यात भारतासाठी अनेक संधी दडल्या आहेत. पहिली संधी म्हणजे आज अत्यंत कमजोर स्थितीत असलेल्या, आंतरराष्ट्रीय दहशतवादाचं केंद्र म्हणून बदनाम झालेल्या पाकिस्तानला शेवटचा दणका देणे.

अंतर्गत शत्रूंच्या नांग्या खोलवर पोचल्या

अंतर्गत सुरक्षेचा मुद्दा काश्मीर खोर्‍यात इतका नाजूक आणि महत्त्वाचा असल्यामुळेच केंद्र सरकारची तिथे इतक्या लवकर निवडणुका घेण्याची इच्छा नव्हती. पण सुप्रीम कोर्टाने सरकारचा सल्ला धुडकावून निवडणुका घेण्याचा आदेश दिला. राज्य सरकारचे नियंत्रण असलेल्या स्थानिक प्रशासनाने ही धोक्याची जागा खुली करण्याचा आदेश कुठल्या आधारावर दिला? यामागे कोणाचा हात होता? असे अनेक प्रश्न निर्माण होतात. अंतर्गत शत्रूंच्या नांग्या किती खोलवर पोचल्या आहेत हे मात्र यातून पुरतं स्पष्ट होतं.

जिथे हत्याकांड झाले तिथे पर्यटकांना जाण्याची परवानगीच नव्हती. पण स्थानिक प्रशासनाने काही स्थानिक टूर ऑपरेटर्सना हाताशी धरून 20 एप्रिल रोजी केंद्र सरकारच्या परवानगीशिवाय ही जागा पर्यटकांसाठी खुली करण्याचा निर्णय घेतला आणि 22 एप्रिल रोजी हे हत्याकांड झाले.

पाकिस्तानची अवस्था सध्या खूपच वाईट

पाकिस्तानची अवस्था सध्या खूपच वाईट झाली आहे. बलुचिस्तानमधले स्वातंत्र्ययोद्धे पाकी लष्कराची इभ्रत पार धुळीला मिळवणार्‍या कारवाया सतत करत आहेत. अर्थव्यवस्था रसातळाला गेली आहे. आजवर पाकिस्तानला पोसणार्‍या अमेरिका आणि सौदी अरेबिया यांनी पाठ फिरवली आहे. अशावेळी जनतेचं लक्ष या सगळ्या प्रश्नांवरून दुसरीकडे वळवण्यासाठी पाक सरकारकडे आणि लष्कराकडे असलेला हुकमाचा पत्ता म्हणजे काश्मीर.काही दिवसांपूर्वी पाक लष्करप्रमुख जन. असीम मुनीर यांनी हिंदू आणि मुसलमान ही वेगळी राष्ट्रे आहेत जी कधीही एक होऊ शकत नाहीत, आम्ही काश्मीर मुक्त केल्याशिवाय स्वस्थ बसणार नाही अशा आशयाची गरळ ओकणारी विधाने केली. याप्रमाणे पहलगामच्या हत्याकांडासाठी पाकिस्तानने मुहूर्त देखील विचारपूर्वक निवडला. त्या दिवशी अमेरिकेचे उपाध्यक्ष व्हान्स भारतात होते. मोदी सौदी अरेबियात होते. काश्मीर प्रश्न पुन्हा आंतरराष्ट्रीय पातळीवर आणण्याचा पाकिस्तानी डाव यात स्पष्ट दिसून येतो

सिंधू नदी आणि भारत-पाकिस्तान संबंध

सिंधू नदी भारत आणि पाकिस्तानच्या काही भागातून वाहणारी एक अत्यंत महत्त्वाची नदी आहे. २२ एप्रिल रोजी काश्मीरमधील पहलगाम येथे पर्यटकांवर झालेल्या भीषण दहशतवादी हल्ल्यानंतर भारताने सिंधू जल करार (Indus Waters Treaty) स्थगित करण्याचा निर्णय घेतला. त्यामुळे, "भारत सिंधू नदीचं पाणी अडवू शकतो का?" हा प्रश्न नव्याने चर्चेत आला आहे.

सिंधू जल करार भारत आणि पाकिस्तान यांच्यात १९६० मध्ये जागतिक बँकेच्या मध्यस्थीत झाला होता. या करारात सहा नद्यांच्या पाण्याचे वाटप ठरवले गेले. भारत आणि पाकिस्तानमध्ये दोन युद्धं आणि अनेक संघर्ष घडूनही हा करार टिकून राहिला होता. मात्र, भारताने पाकिस्तानच्या सीमापार दहशतवादाला उत्तर देण्यासाठी आता सिंधू जल कराराला तात्पुरती स्थगिती दिली आहे.

सिंधू जल करार आणि पाण्याचे वाटप

सिंधू जल करारानुसार, सिंधू नदीच्या खोऱ्यातील रावी, बियास आणि सतलज या तीन पूर्वेकडील नद्यांचा वापर भारत करू शकतो. तर सिंधू, झेलम आणि चिनाब या तीन पश्चिमेकडील नद्यांचे ८० टक्के पाणी पाकिस्तानला वापरण्याचा अधिकार आहे.
या वाटपावर आधारित पाण्याचा वापर शेती, जलविद्युत प्रकल्प आणि पिण्यासाठी होतो. पाकिस्तानमध्ये ८० टक्क्यांहून अधिक शेती आणि जवळपास एकतृतीयांश वीज निर्मिती सिंधू नदीच्या पाण्यावर अवलंबून आहे.

पूर्वीही जलसंधारण प्रकल्पांवरून दोन्ही देशांमध्ये वाद झाले आहेत. भारताच्या काही जलविद्युत प्रकल्पांना पाकिस्तानने आंतरराष्ट्रीय न्यायालयात आव्हान दिले होते, कारण त्याचा प्रभाव सिंधू कराराच्या अटींवर होतो असे पाकिस्तानचे म्हणणे होते.

कश्मीरमध्ये दहशतवाद्यांच्या समर्थकांना पकडले जात आहे भारतात त्यांना वै...

पाकिस्तानला लक्ष्य करणारी एक व्यापक धोरणात्मक कृती योजना -KAHMIR PELGAM ...

#PUNISHING PAKISTAN #KASHMIR PEHELGAM UPDATE 27 APR 25

 

1. Diplomatic Action

• Declare Pakistan officially as a state sponsor of terrorism in the United Nations Security Council (UNSC).

• Declare the Chief of Army Staff (COAS) of the Pakistan Army as a global terrorist.

• Focus diplomatic efforts on isolating Pakistan internationally.

2. Target: Pakistani Army

• The main objective should be the destruction of the Pakistani Army's capabilities.

• Intelligence suggests that the COAS has already moved his family outside Pakistan, indicating internal fear and instability.

• Monitor how the Pakistan Army is redeploying forces internally amidst growing pressures.

3. Internal Weaknesses of Pakistani Military

• The defense preparedness of the Pakistani Army is at a critically poor level.

• Severe shortages in ammunition, weapons, and equipment.

• Heavy losses and plummeting morale within military ranks.

• Significant losses in Balochistan and the Northwest Frontier provinces due to insurgencies.

4. Pakistan’s Economic Collapse

• Pakistan is experiencing an economic emergency and is fast becoming a failed state.

• The Indus Water Treaty implications must be reviewed to apply additional pressure.

5. Opportunities for India

• This situation presents a historic opportunity for the Baloch people to seek independence.

• Launch a multi-dimensional offensive:

  • Economic warfare (sanctions, pressure on IMF/World Bank assistance)

  • Cyber warfare (target critical infrastructure)

  • Trade warfare (limit trade routes, increase tariffs)

  • Covert operations (support internal resistance groups)

6. International Support

• India enjoys maximum international goodwill and support in recent times.

• Strategize on how to leverage global support to further isolate and weaken Pakistan diplomatically and economically.

7. Ground Realities

• Pakistani government and groups like Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) are showing signs of backing down under pressure.

• Local populations in conflict zones are facing hardships — many houses have been destroyed.

• Intelligence operations have led to the capture of Pakistani infiltrators and also Bangladeshi illegal migrants.

8. Nuclear Threat and Supply Chain Issues

• Counter Pakistan's nuclear blackmail by exposing its vulnerabilities and instability.

• Pakistan is facing severe supply chain disruptions, impacting military and civilian sectors alike.

Current Security Situation in Jammu and Kashmir 26 APR 25

 At least 65 foreign terrorists from three different terror outfits are currently active in Jammu and Kashmir, according to security officials. This number has risen from 59 in the first week of March, indicating a concerning trend. A significant portion, approximately 35, belongs to Lashkar-e-Taiba, which has been implicated in the recent attack in Pahalgam. Additionally, 21 terrorists are affiliated with Jaish-e-Mohammed, while three belong to Hizbul Mujahideen. In response to this escalating threat, the Centre has initiated 26 measures to tackle infiltration and enhance surveillance. Officials express growing concern regarding the ongoing movement of foreign terrorists, prompting increased collaboration among security forces to effectively address these challenges.

Strengthening Security in Kashmir Valley

Following the recent terror attack in Pahalgam, security agencies are devising a strategy to eliminate the security "vacuum" in the Kashmir valley. This plan includes the permanent deployment of army and paramilitary forces in the mountains overlooking this popular tourist destination. Officials have indicated the necessity of realigning security forces, especially with the annual Amarnath pilgrimage set to commence on July 3. Currently, there are no security forces in the densely forested Bisaran Valley, complicating timely troop movement. The nearest units are located significant distances away and are only accessible by foot or horseback. Final arrangements for the enhanced security grid in the region are expected to be confirmed shortly, reflecting the urgent need to ensure safety for both pilgrims and local residents.

Intelligence Failures and Ongoing Investigations

Preliminary investigations into the Pahalgam terror attack have revealed critical failures in intelligence and inadequate deployment of forces at the targeted site, resulting in one of the deadliest incidents in Jammu and Kashmir. These attacks have exposed significant flaws in the Unified Command setup, which failed to provide actionable intelligence and effectively counter terrorism in the region. Despite the high footfall of tourists in this scenic area, security measures were deemed insufficient. The Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF), initially deployed for "area domination," was withdrawn for other locations prior to the attack. Multi-agency probes are currently ongoing to uncover the full extent of the conspiracy, with evidence suggesting that at least two of the attackers communicated in Pashto, indicating they may be Pakistani terrorists. Authorities are intensifying efforts to flush out any remaining terrorists in the vicinity.

Counterterrorism Operations in Baramulla

On Wednesday, two terrorists were killed along the Line of Control in Baramulla district of north Kashmir, according to army officials. A large cache of weapons was recovered from the site following an encounter that erupted around 1 AM after the Indian Army received intelligence regarding the presence of terrorists near Uri Nallah. Brigadier Mayank Shukla, Commander of the 161 Infantry Brigade, stated that they had been receiving continuous information about the movement of Pakistani terrorists in the Uri sector for several days. He noted that when the terrorists crossed the LoC, Indian forces ambushed them, neutralizing the two terrorists in a two-hour firefight.

Enhancing Satellite Surveillance Capabilities

India plans to launch 100-150 additional satellites over the next three years to bolster border and coastal surveillance, as announced by ISRO Chairman V Narayanan. Currently, India operates about 55 satellites to monitor its 7,500 km border, a number Narayanan deemed insufficient. He emphasized that reforms in the Space Sector, which allow private participation in satellite and rocket development, are essential for these advancements. During a recent event, Narayanan also highlighted successful satellite docking operations as part of ISRO's SpAdEx missions. This initiative aims to ensure comprehensive monitoring of the country’s borders, with the increase in satellite capacity seen as crucial for national security, especially in light of recent security incidents.

Pakistan's Military Response

In the aftermath of the Pahalgam terror attack, Pakistan has intensified military activity along the India-Pakistan border. The Pakistan Air Force and Army are reorienting their assets to prepare for potential Indian retaliation. Initial findings suggest that the attack was meticulously planned to maximize casualties. The Inter Services Public Relations (ISPR) has released visuals of military exercises near the border, and sources indicate that around 40 launch pads in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir are housing over 100 terrorists ready to cross into India. Meanwhile, Pakistan's Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif is under pressure to ensure the military’s credibility amid increasing public resentment following Imran Khan’s removal. General Asim Munir, the Chief of Army Staff, has emphasized the need to restore the military's reputation, while the ISI chief is strategizing a robust response to anticipated Indian actions, drawing on lessons from past military exercises.

Pahalgam Terror Attack: A National Tragedy PART 2

 Ongoing Military Operations

Hav Jhantu Ali Shaikh of the 6 PARA (SF) tragically lost his life during a joint operation with the Army and J&K Police in Udhampur, based on intelligence about terrorist activity in the area. Despite medical efforts, Shaikh succumbed to his injuries. Tributes have poured in for the brave soldier, acknowledging his sacrifice and valor as security forces continue their operations in the region.

Military Exercises Amid Tensions

The Indian Air Force is conducting ‘Exercise Aakraman’ in the Central sector, featuring its frontline fighter aircraft. While this is described as a routine exercise, it occurs amid heightened tensions following the Pahalgam attack.

Naval Capabilities on Display

The Indian Navy's INS Surat, a guided missile destroyer, successfully executed a precision strike against a sea-skimming target, showcasing India's advancing maritime capabilities. This milestone highlights the Navy's readiness and aligns with the Atmanirbhar Bharat mission, especially in light of escalating tensions in the Arabian Sea.

Recruitment Scam in the Navy

Odisha police have uncovered a significant scam involving the recruitment process for the Indian Navy, resulting in the arrest of three Navy personnel for allegedly defrauding job aspirants. The arrests followed an FIR and reveal that the accused collected large sums of money under false pretenses, with investigations ongoing to determine if more individuals were involved.

Calls for Peace in Maoist Regions

Various organizations have appealed to President Droupadi Murmu to intervene in halting military operations and initiating peace talks in Maoist-affected tribal regions of Chhattisgarh, Maharashtra, and Jharkhand. The memorandum emphasizes the need for a genuine peace process, highlighting the loss of lives in Bastar since January 2024.

Milipol India 2025 Exhibition

The second edition of Milipol India 2025 was inaugurated in New Delhi, showcasing advanced defense solutions and strengthening Indo-French collaboration in homeland security. The exhibition featured innovative technologies, reaffirming the commitment of both nations to global security and counter-terrorism efforts.

Border Security Incident

A BSF constable was detained by Pakistan Rangers after inadvertently crossing the zero line while on duty in the Ferozepur sector.

Impact of Airspace Closure

Pakistan's decision to close its airspace to Indian-registered aircraft has led to longer flight durations and increased airfares on routes to Europe, North America, and the Middle East. Experts predict significant fare hikes due to rerouting of flights, which comes amid heightened diplomatic tensions following the Pahalgam attack.

Challenge to the Indus Waters Treaty

Pakistan plans to contest India's suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty before the World Bank, as the treaty governs water distribution between the two nations. India's recent suspension, citing cross-border terrorism concerns, intensifies existing tensions.

Postponement of Diplomatic Visit

Pakistan's Deputy Prime Minister Ishaq Dar has postponed his scheduled visit to Bangladesh, citing unforeseen circumstances amid rising tensions with India following the Pahalgam attack

 

 

 

 

UPDATE-Pahalgam Terror Attack: A National Tragedy

 

Prime Minister's Strong Response

In his first public address after the Pahalgam terror attack, Prime Minister Narendra Modi vowed to pursue the terrorists and their sponsors relentlessly, promising justice for the victims. Speaking in Madhubani, Bihar, he condemned the attack as an assault on India's very essence and underscored the nation's unity against terrorism. Modi announced significant retaliatory measures, including the suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty and the downgrading of diplomatic ties with Pakistan, which is accused of facilitating the attackers. This tragic incident, carried out by the Resistance Front—an affiliate of Lashkar-e-Taiba—claimed 26 lives, predominantly tourists, sparking widespread mourning and international condemnation.

Army Chief's Visit to Jammu and Kashmir

Chief of Army Staff General Upendra Dwivedi is scheduled to visit Srinagar to assess the security situation in Jammu and Kashmir following the attack. Senior Army Commanders will provide briefings on various security aspects. It remains uncertain whether the Army chief will travel to Pahalgam during his visit.

Escalating Tensions with Pakistan

In the aftermath of the Pahalgam attack, Pakistan has heightened tensions with India, threatening to suspend the Simla Agreement and other bilateral agreements. The country has closed its airspace to Indian airlines, halted trade, and shut down the Wagah border post. Pakistan's Deputy Prime Minister Ishaq Dar condemned India's suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty, stating that any diversion of water would be viewed as an act of war. These actions reflect a tit-for-tat response to India's punitive measures, which include expelling Pakistani military attachés and closing the Attari land transit post.

Identification of Suspects

The Jammu and Kashmir Police have identified three suspects in the attack: Pakistani nationals Hashim Musa and Ali Bhai (alias Talha), and local resident Adil Hussain Thoker from Anantnag district. Musa and Ali have reportedly been active in the Valley for nearly two years, while Thoker, who visited Pakistan in 2018, is believed to have acted as their guide. Eyewitness accounts have led to sketches of the attackers, and authorities are exploring the possibility of a fourth accomplice. The attackers executed extensive reconnaissance, leveraging the remote Baisaran meadow to evade security forces. Ongoing search operations are taking place in the Pir Panjal range, with the National Investigation Agency expected to take over the investigation.

High-Level Security Meetings

Union Home Secretary Govind Mohan convened a high-level meeting with the chiefs of the Intelligence Bureau (IB) and the Research and Analysis Wing (RAW) to review the security landscape in Jammu and Kashmir. While specific details from the meeting remain undisclosed, it focused on enhancing internal security measures. Union Home Minister Amit Shah is expected to lead a key meeting soon, and the National Investigation Agency is likely to assume control of the probe due to its international implications. Investigators have identified five attackers, including three Pakistani nationals, but none have been apprehended yet.

Global Condemnation

World leaders, including Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba, and Jordan's King Abdullah II, have expressed solidarity with India in the wake of the Pahalgam terror attack. They condemned the violence and emphasized the need to combat terrorism universally. Leaders from Egypt, Italy, and France also conveyed their condolences, with French President Emmanuel Macron labeling the attack as "barbaric" and unacceptable. This global response highlights a unified stance against terrorism and support for India's commitment to bringing the attackers to justice.

Victims of the Attack

The Pahalgam terror attack resulted in the deaths of 26 individuals, including gunmen who were reportedly minors equipped with head-mounted cameras. Among the victims was Sushil Nathaniel, a 58-year-old LIC manager from Indore, who was tragically shot in front of his family. The attackers targeted Baisaran, a picturesque tourist destination known as "Mini Switzerland," leaving many injured and traumatized. Survivors recounted the horrifying experience, noting that the attackers even took selfies during the assault.

Heroic Sacrifice

IAF Corporal Tage Hailyang displayed remarkable bravery during the attack, guiding tourists to safety before sacrificing his own life. Arunachal Pradesh Chief Minister Pema Khandu paid tribute to Hailyang, honoring him as a symbol of valor whose selflessness will inspire future generations. The state government has announced financial assistance of ₹50 lakh and a job for a family member, along with plans for a permanent memorial in his village.

Adjustments at the Border

In response to the Pahalgam attack, the Border Security Force (BSF) has scaled back the ceremonial beating retreat at India-Pakistan border points, including Attari, Hussainwala, and Sadki in Punjab. The traditional handshake between the BSF and Pakistan Rangers has been suspended, and border gates remained closed during the event. This decision underscores India's serious concerns about cross-border hostilities and its position that peace and provocation cannot coexist.

Visa Revocation

India has announced the revocation of all visas issued to Pakistani nationals, effective April 27, following the Pahalgam terror attack. Additionally, India has suspended the official X account of the Government of Pakistan. These measures are part of broader punitive actions, including the expulsion of Pakistani military attachés and the suspension of the Indus Water Treaty. Pakistani nationals in India are rushing to return home, and Indian authorities are advising citizens to avoid travel to Pakistan.

अनेक दहशतवादी समर्थकांना पकडले त्यांची परंतु त्यांना वैचारिक पाठिंबा दे...

India vs Pakistan Pahalgam Attack | भारताची पाकविरुद्ध युद्धाची तयारी? H...

PAHELGAM UPDTE -25 APR-Diplomatic Measures Against Pakistan Modi's Return from Saudi Arabia Home Minister's Visit to Pahalgam Commitment to Decisive Action All-Party Meeting on the Attack Chief Minister's Response US Condemnation of the Attack Tracing the Attackers Investigation into the Attack Rise in Foreign Terrorists

 

Diplomatic Measures Against Pakistan

In response to the recent terror attack in Pahalgam that resulted in the deaths of 26 tourists, India has announced a series of punitive diplomatic measures against Pakistan. These actions include the immediate suspension of the 1960 Indus Waters Treaty, the closure of the Attari border check post, and the downgrading of bilateral relations. Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri emphasized that the perpetrators will face justice, linking the attack to cross-border terrorism. Additionally, Pakistani nationals will be barred from traveling to India under the SAARC visa exemption plan, and the number of personnel in high commissions in both countries will be reduced. These measures are part of a broader strategy to enhance scrutiny and cooperation with Indian security forces to prevent future incidents.

High-Level Security Meeting

Prime Minister Narendra Modi held a high-level meeting to assess the security situation following the terror attack in Pahalgam. He received updates from senior officials, including Home Minister Amit Shah and Defence Minister Rajnath Singh, who vowed to track down both the attackers and those in Pakistan who orchestrated the violence. Singh reaffirmed India's commitment to a strong diplomatic response and emphasized the pursuit of justice for the victims. The meeting also addressed enhancing security measures in Jammu and Kashmir, with the US Vice President extending condolences and offering support in the fight against terrorism.

Modi's Return from Saudi Arabia

In the wake of the Pahalgam terror attack, Prime Minister Narendra Modi cut short his two-day visit to Saudi Arabia and returned to New Delhi. During discussions with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, both leaders condemned terrorism and recognized it as one of humanity's gravest threats. They stressed that there can be no justification for acts of terror and highlighted the need to prevent access to weapons, including missiles and drones. Their joint statement reaffirmed a commitment to cooperation in counter-terrorism efforts and condemned cross-border terrorism, calling for a unified global response.

Home Minister's Visit to Pahalgam

Union Home Minister Amit Shah visited the site of the attack in Pahalgam, where terrorists killed 26 individuals, mostly tourists. He laid wreaths on the coffins of the victims and interacted with their families. Shah chaired a high-level security meeting at the Raj Bhawan, attended by key officials including the Lieutenant Governor of Jammu and Kashmir, the chief minister, and top officers from the army and paramilitary forces. He asserted that India will not bend to terrorism and promised that those responsible for the attack will not escape justice.

Commitment to Decisive Action

Defence Minister Rajnath Singh pledged that India would take decisive action against both the attackers of the Pahalgam incident and those who orchestrate such violence from behind the scenes. His remarks came during a high-level meeting focused on reviewing the security situation in Jammu and Kashmir. Singh emphasized the need for a comprehensive and retaliatory strategy, urging enhanced military responses against terrorist groups. He condemned the attack as cowardly and reiterated India’s determination to address terrorism effectively.

All-Party Meeting on the Attack

Defence Minister Rajnath Singh is set to convene an all-party meeting to discuss the attack on tourists in Pahalgam. This decision follows discussions between Singh and Home Minister Amit Shah with party leaders. Earlier, Prime Minister Modi had chaired a meeting of the Cabinet Committee on Security to review the security situation in the region.

Chief Minister's Response

Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Omar Abdullah announced that he has called an all-party meeting to address the repercussions of the terror attack in Pahalgam. He shared this news via a post on social media.

US Condemnation of the Attack

US Vice President J.D. Vance spoke with Prime Minister Modi to strongly condemn the Pahalgam terror attack. During their conversation, Vance expressed the United States' solidarity with the people of India during this difficult time and conveyed his condolences for the lives lost.

Tracing the Attackers

Indian intelligence agencies have traced the digital footprints of the Pahalgam attackers to safehouses in Muzaffarabad and Karachi, indicating Pakistan's involvement. Preliminary forensic analysis and eyewitness statements revealed that the five terrorists were well-equipped with automatic weapons, including AK rifles, and some wore military-style fatigues.

Investigation into the Attack

An investigation into the Pahalgam terror attack has uncovered that a total of seven terrorists were involved, with four to five believed to be from Pakistan. Eyewitness accounts suggest that at least two local militants may have assisted the attackers, who are suspected to have communicated in Urdu. Authorities have released sketches of three suspects and announced a reward of ₹20 lakh for information leading to their identification.

Claim of Responsibility

The Resistance Front (TRF), an offshoot of the Pakistan-based terrorist group Lashkar-e-Taiba, has claimed responsibility for the attack on tourists in Pahalgam. Known for instilling fear among local populations, TRF has been involved in various violent activities. The Indian Ministry of Home Affairs previously banned TRF under the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act in January 2023.

Rise in Foreign Terrorists

Security officials report that at least 65 foreign terrorists from three different outfits are currently active in Jammu and Kashmir. This figure has increased from 59 in early March, with a significant portion belonging to Lashkar-e-Taiba, which has been implicated in the Pahalgam attack. In response, the Centre has initiated 26 measures to enhance surveillance and tackle infiltration.

Enhancing Security in Kashmir

Following the Pahalgam terror attack, security agencies are developing a plan to address the security "vacuum" in the Kashmir valley by permanently deploying army and paramilitary forces in the mountains overlooking the tourist destination. This realignment is deemed necessary, especially with the annual Amarnath pilgrimage approaching.

Flaws in Intelligence and Security

Preliminary investigations have revealed significant failures in intelligence and inadequate deployment of forces at the site of the Pahalgam attack. The incident exposed flaws in the Unified Command setup, which was unable to provide actionable intelligence. Authorities are focusing efforts on flushing out remaining terrorists in the vicinity.

Public Response and Shutdown

In response to the attack, Kashmir observed a shutdown, with businesses and schools closing across the region. This marked the first significant closure since the abrogation of Article 370 in 2019. In Pahalgam and Srinagar, markets were shuttered, and tributes were paid to the victims, with Chief Minister Abdullah announcing compensation for the deceased and injured.

Condemnation from Muslim Organizations

Prominent Muslim organizations condemned the Pahalgam terror attack, asserting that terrorism contradicts the principles of peace in Islam. Leaders from various groups announced plans to deliver strong messages against terrorism during Friday prayers.

Impact on Tourism

Following the attack, Delhi-based travel agencies reported nearly 90% cancellations for trips to Jammu and Kashmir. Families cited safety concerns, and many are seeking refunds or alternative destinations, disrupting the peak tourist season.

Resumption of Helicopter Operations

Advanced Light Helicopters (ALH) have resumed operations in Anantnag, Jammu and Kashmir, following a crash earlier this year that grounded the fleet for safety checks. The ground commander received permission from the Union Defence Ministry to deploy the helicopters based on operational needs.