Total Pageviews

Sunday 20 October 2024

Western Narrative Building and the Threat of Regime Change In India

 For years, the Deep State has harbored the goal of balkanizing India, a mission aligned with the ambitions of its proxies in Rawalpindi and Islamabad. The ongoing Khalistan issue—a sensitive and unresolved conflict for New Delhi—has become a convenient tool for Western intelligence networks to exert pressure on India.

Exploiting the Khalistan Issue

The Khalistan movement, which continues to stir unrest, offers the West a prime opportunity to destabilize India. Although Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's absurd accusations against India might seem laughable, they raise critical questions: What’s really going on? Who is driving this agenda? Why now? And what precedents are we witnessing?

The Role of Narrative Warfare

 In August, we saw similar dynamics in Bangladesh, where Sheikh Hasina became the target.

The West has perfected a pattern: label someone as a "terrorist" or a "threat" and then proceed to remove them. The idiom “give a dog a bad name and hang him” fits perfectly here. Through control over Big Tech and the Western media, these narratives are gaslighted to the masses, manufacturing consent for regime change. What’s even more concerning is that most people, except for the Western elites, believe these narratives and blame themselves for not seeing the threat sooner.

Trudeau’s Attack on India: A Precursor to a Bigger Agenda?

Trudeau’s family has long ignored the Khalistani terror issue, even in the aftermath of the 1985 Air India bombing that killed 329 people. The Canadian government's incompetence in handling this has been widely criticized, yet no justice has been served. Individuals like US-based Khalistani activist Gurpatwant Singh Pannun continue to incite violence against India without facing any consequences.

After Trudeau’s recent tirades, we have seen a spike in bomb threats against Indian-owned aircraft. These incidents, including an Air India flight being forced to land in Canada, point to potential Khalistani involvement.

Is India the Next Target for Regime Change?

The current Western narrative paints the "Modi regime" as fascist and brutal, a stepping stone toward labeling India as a rogue state. The next logical step in this narrative would be regime change. But is India prepared to defend itself from such a scenario? This strategy is straight out of the Deep State playbook, and while it might seem improbable given the US presidential election, it’s possible that other forces, like the British, could be behind the attack on India.

The British Angle and the Five Eyes Alliance

Keir Starmer’s quick support for Trudeau raised suspicions that this assault on India may have British origins. Two factors stand out: the rise of an Indian-origin British prime minister, Rishi Sunak, and the Chagossians regaining control over their territory, which has implications for the US base at Diego Garcia. The Five Eyes alliance—composed of the US, UK, Australia, Canada, and New Zealand—has historically viewed itself as superior, and this attack on India seems to be in line with their larger geopolitical goals.

Subnational Diplomacy and US Intentions

The US has been actively engaging in subnational diplomacy, with officials like Ambassador Eric Garcetti meeting Indian state leaders and offering funds. This level of involvement raises questions about America's true intentions, particularly in restive regions like Northeast India. While a strong US-India relationship is in both countries’ interests, recent developments have left many questioning the sincerity of such partnerships.

Dangerous Times Ahead

India faces dangerous times, with external forces seemingly intent on destabilizing the country. From Madeleine Albright’s era to the possibility of Kamala Harris in the White House, anti-India sentiment in certain factions of the US establishment is deeply worrying. As India navigates these turbulent waters, it must remain vigilant against the growing narrative warfare aimed at undermining its sovereignty.

No comments:

Post a Comment